Tessa Burton

442 total citations
9 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

Tessa Burton is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Tessa Burton has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Health, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Tessa Burton's work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers) and Sex work and related issues (2 papers). Tessa Burton is often cited by papers focused on Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers) and Sex work and related issues (2 papers). Tessa Burton collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Tessa Burton's co-authors include Natasha E. Latzman, Andra Teten Tharp, Alana M. Vivolo‐Kantor, Linda Anne Valle, Phyllis Holditch Niolon, Bruce G. Taylor, Martin J. Hatlie, Richard Hovey, Elizabeth A. Mumford and Sharon R. Ghazarian and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Journal of Adolescent Health and Qualitative Health Research.

In The Last Decade

Tessa Burton

9 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tessa Burton United States	5	236	133	128	97	89	9	323
Karen Powell Sears United States	6	187 0.8×	112 0.8×	116 0.9×	69 0.7×	146 1.6×	9	320
Joanna Nurse United Kingdom	8	121 0.5×	133 1.0×	160 1.3×	51 0.5×	123 1.4×	12	328
Ladan Hashemi New Zealand	11	148 0.6×	100 0.8×	107 0.8×	58 0.6×	76 0.9×	37	276
Carrie F. Mulford United States	11	151 0.6×	84 0.6×	151 1.2×	46 0.5×	150 1.7×	17	346
Sara F. Stein United States	12	246 1.0×	133 1.0×	201 1.6×	43 0.4×	79 0.9×	37	376
Monique Clinton-Sherrod United States	12	225 1.0×	108 0.8×	201 1.6×	120 1.2×	124 1.4×	19	409
Jennifer Poudrier Canada	9	93 0.4×	115 0.9×	34 0.3×	40 0.4×	149 1.7×	16	285
Laura Šinko United States	11	163 0.7×	86 0.6×	262 2.0×	77 0.8×	113 1.3×	42	406
Katie Schultz United States	10	153 0.6×	113 0.8×	152 1.2×	23 0.2×	102 1.1×	30	327
Melissa A. Talamantes United States	12	173 0.7×	131 1.0×	186 1.5×	21 0.2×	109 1.2×	18	405

Countries citing papers authored by Tessa Burton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tessa Burton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tessa Burton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tessa Burton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tessa Burton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tessa Burton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tessa Burton. The network helps show where Tessa Burton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tessa Burton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tessa Burton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tessa Burton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tessa Burton. Tessa Burton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Jones, Christopher, Sarah Bacon, Tessa Burton, et al.. (2020). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control adverse childhood experiences prevention strategy FY2021-FY2024. 1 indexed citations

2.

Niolon, Phyllis Holditch, Alana M. Vivolo‐Kantor, Allison J. Tracy, et al.. (2019). An RCT of Dating Matters: Effects on Teen Dating Violence and Relationship Behaviors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 57(1). 13–23. 101 indexed citations

3.

Niolon, Phyllis Holditch, Alison Tracy, Todd D. Little, et al.. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of Dating Matters®: Effects on teen dating violence and relationship behaviors. 1 indexed citations

4.

Niolon, Phyllis Holditch, Alana M. Vivolo‐Kantor, Natasha E. Latzman, et al.. (2015). Prevalence of Teen Dating Violence and Co-occurring Risk Factors Among Middle School Youth in High-Risk Urban Communities. Journal of Adolescent Health. 56(2). S5–S13. 115 indexed citations

5.

Clinton-Sherrod, Monique, et al.. (2015). 12 Implementing a multilevel approach to teen dating violence: lessons learned from the dating matters^® initiative. Abstracts. A4.3–A5. 1 indexed citations

6.

Patterson, Jennifer, et al.. (2012). Using Research to Understand Youth in High-Risk Urban Communities. Social Marketing Quarterly. 18(3). 187–202. 4 indexed citations

7.

Briggs, Michael B., et al.. (2012). Understanding and Engaging Key Influencers of Youth in High-Risk Urban Communities. Social Marketing Quarterly. 18(3). 203–220. 3 indexed citations

8.

Tharp, Andra Teten, Tessa Burton, Diane M. Hall, et al.. (2011). Dating Matters™: Strategies to Promote Healthy Teen Relationships. Journal of Women s Health. 20(12). 1761–1765. 54 indexed citations

9.

Hovey, Richard, et al.. (2011). Patient Safety: A Consumer’s Perspective. Qualitative Health Research. 21(5). 662–672. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact