Terence Cuneo

2.0k total citations
59 papers, 542 citations indexed

About

Terence Cuneo is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Terence Cuneo has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 542 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Philosophy, 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Terence Cuneo's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (26 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers) and Free Will and Agency (10 papers). Terence Cuneo is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (26 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers) and Free Will and Agency (10 papers). Terence Cuneo collaborates with scholars based in United States. Terence Cuneo's co-authors include Russ Shafer‐Landau, John Bengson, Nicholas Wolterstorff and R. van Woudenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Terence Cuneo

51 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers

Terence Cuneo
Jonathan Matheson United States
Kieran Setiya United States
Erik J. Wielenberg United States
Sharon Street United States
Nicholas L. Sturgeon United States
Matthew Chrisman United Kingdom
Wayne D. Riggs United States
Jonathan Way United Kingdom
Conor McHugh United Kingdom
Nishi Shah United States
Jonathan Matheson United States
Terence Cuneo
Citations per year, relative to Terence Cuneo Terence Cuneo (= 1×) peers Jonathan Matheson

Countries citing papers authored by Terence Cuneo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Terence Cuneo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Terence Cuneo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terence Cuneo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Terence Cuneo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Terence Cuneo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Terence Cuneo. The network helps show where Terence Cuneo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Terence Cuneo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Terence Cuneo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Terence Cuneo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Terence Cuneo. Terence Cuneo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bengson, John, Terence Cuneo, & Russ Shafer‐Landau. (2024). The Moral Universe. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cuneo, Terence. (2024). Does the Orthodox tradition have anything to contribute to analytic theology?. Religious Studies. 61(2). 334–349.
3.
Cuneo, Terence, et al.. (2023). Wholly Good, Holy God. 11. 411–423. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bengson, John, Terence Cuneo, & Russ Shafer‐Landau. (2022). Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press eBooks. 7 indexed citations
5.
Cuneo, Terence. (2018). The Evolutionary Challenge to Knowing Moral Reasons. Oxford University Press eBooks.
6.
Cuneo, Terence. (2017). The Inaccessibility of Religion Problem. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 4(20201214). 1 indexed citations
7.
Cuneo, Terence. (2016). Ritualized Faith. Oxford University Press eBooks. 22 indexed citations
8.
Cuneo, Terence. (2016). Ritualized Faith: Essays on the Philosophy of Liturgy. 14 indexed citations
9.
Cuneo, Terence & Russ Shafer‐Landau. (2014). The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism. Philosophical Studies. 171(3). 399–443. 109 indexed citations
10.
Cuneo, Terence. (2014). Reid on the first principles of morals. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 41(S1). 102–121. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cuneo, Terence, et al.. (2014). Christine Korsgaard’s Self-Constitution. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 11(1). 97–110. 2 indexed citations
12.
Cuneo, Terence. (2014). Liturgical Immersion. 2. 117–139. 1 indexed citations
13.
Cuneo, Terence, et al.. (2013). Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn, by Paul Weithman. Faith and Philosophy. 30(3). 357–361. 1 indexed citations
14.
Cuneo, Terence. (2013). Transforming the self: on the baptismal rite. Religious Studies. 50(3). 279–296. 2 indexed citations
15.
Cuneo, Terence. (2008). INTUITIONISM'S BURDEN: THOMAS REID ON THE PROBLEM OF MORAL MOTIVATION. Journal of Scottish Philosophy. 6(1). 21–44. 3 indexed citations
16.
Cuneo, Terence. (2006). Signs of Value: Reid on the Evidential Role of Feelings in Moral Judgement. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 14(1). 69–91. 13 indexed citations
17.
Cuneo, Terence. (2004). Critical Notice. Journal of Scottish Philosophy. 2(2). 194–199. 2 indexed citations
18.
Cuneo, Terence, et al.. (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 26 indexed citations
19.
Cuneo, Terence. (2001). Finite and Infinite Goods. International Philosophical Quarterly. 41(2). 252–253. 60 indexed citations
20.
Cuneo, Terence. (1999). Capacities for goodness: A defense of neo-Aristotelian moral realism. Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026