This map shows the geographic impact of T.C.P. Melman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.C.P. Melman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.C.P. Melman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.C.P. Melman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.C.P. Melman. The network helps show where T.C.P. Melman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T.C.P. Melman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T.C.P. Melman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T.C.P. Melman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T.C.P. Melman. T.C.P. Melman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kleijn, David, et al.. (2012). Brandganzen en Kleine Mantelmeeuwen in het Wormer- en Jisperveld : effecten op weidevogels. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
5.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2011). Oproep; Kerngebieden voor weidevogels, wat brengt dat ons?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 112(6).1 indexed citations
6.
Kleijn, David, et al.. (2009). Het belang van hoog waterpeil en bemesting voor de Grutto: I. de vestigingsfase.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 110. 180–183.2 indexed citations
7.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (2009). An internet-accessible knowledge system on spatial evaluation of the habitat of meadow birds. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1993–1999.1 indexed citations
8.
Kleijn, David, et al.. (2009). De relatie tussen gebruiksintensiteit en de kwaliteit van graslanden als foerageerhabitat voor gruttokuikens. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.2 indexed citations
9.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2008). Kerngebieden voor weidevogels. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 109(5). 212–213.2 indexed citations
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2008). Application of open source and proprietary software to optimise meadow bird management schemes in the Netherlands. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 325–332.3 indexed citations
12.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2007). Ecologische evaluatie regelingen voor natuurbeheer : programma beheer en Staatsbosbeheer 2000-2006. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
13.
Kleijn, David, et al.. (2007). De voedselsituatie voor gruttokuikens bij agrarisch mozaïekbeheer. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.
14.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (2007). Onderbouwing grutto-geschiktheidskaart Nederland; ten behoeve van grutto-mozaïekmodel en identificatie van weidevogelgebieden in Nederland. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
15.
Melman, T.C.P., et al.. (2006). Evaluatie weidevogelbeheer met een grutto-mozaiekmodel. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 107(3). 141–145.1 indexed citations
16.
Schotman, A.G.M., et al.. (2005). Naar een grutto-mozaïekmodel : definitie van een model voor evaluatie vooraf van de effectiviteit van mozaïekbeheer, stand van zaken juni 2005. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
17.
Melman, T.C.P.. (1991). Slootkanten in het veenweidegebied : mogelijkheden voor behoud en ontwikkeling van natuur in agrarisch grasland. Leiden Repository (Leiden University).10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.