Tatsuyuki Arimura
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Chiharu KuboMasako HosoiMark P. JensenRie IwakiIvan MoltonNobuyuki SudoDawn M. EhdeSarah A. O’Brien
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers)Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Tatsuyuki Arimura
17 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Psychiatry and Mental health 157
- Pharmacology 149
- Clinical Psychology 71
- Cognitive Neuroscience 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Tatsuyuki Arimura
This map shows the geographic impact of Tatsuyuki Arimura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tatsuyuki Arimura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tatsuyuki Arimura more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tatsuyuki Arimura
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tatsuyuki Arimura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tatsuyuki Arimura. The network helps show where Tatsuyuki Arimura may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tatsuyuki Arimura
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tatsuyuki Arimura. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tatsuyuki Arimura based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tatsuyuki Arimura. Tatsuyuki Arimura is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | Associations between Body Dysmorphic Concern and Alexithymia in Undergraduate Students | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Development of the Japanese Version of Body Image Concern Inventory | 1 |
| 11 | Trends in Alexisomia Research and Future Problems : Literature Review | 1 |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 72 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | Inpatient Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa in the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kyushu University( Eating Disorders : Treatment Environment and its Effectiveness) | 1 |
| 17 | The Reliability and Factorial Validity of the Japanese Version of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) | 29 |
About Tatsuyuki Arimura
Tatsuyuki Arimura is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (157 citations), Pharmacology (149 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations). Tatsuyuki Arimura has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Chiharu Kubo, Masako Hosoi, Mark P. Jensen, Rie Iwaki, Ivan Molton, Nobuyuki Sudo, Dawn M. Ehde, Sarah A. O’Brien, Masanori Tanaka and Jun Tayama. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain and Body Image.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.