Task Force
- Oncology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Gastroenterology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Todd H. BaronBo ShenRobert D. FanelliKevin E. WascoSteven D. WexnerDavid E. BeckNeil HymanG. W. Chang
- Topics
- Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper)Nuclear and radioactivity studies (1 paper)Research Data Management Practices (1 paper)
- Journals
- Gastrointestinal EndoscopyIEEE Power Engineering ReviewAJP Advances in Physiology Education
- Partner nations
- AustraliaTaiwanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Task Force
8 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Oncology 249
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 208
- Surgery 128
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 55
- Gastroenterology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Task Force
This map shows the geographic impact of Task Force's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Task Force with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Task Force more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Task Force
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Task Force. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Task Force. The network helps show where Task Force may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Task Force
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Task Force. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Task Force based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Task Force. Task Force is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Research Data Management at the University of Colorado Boulder: Recommendations in Support of Fostering 21st Century Research Excellence | 3 |
| 4 | 296 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | Latino Student Eligibility and Participation in the University of California: Ya Basta! | 7 |
| 7 | Nuclear energy safety challenges in the former Soviet Union : a consensus report of the CSIS Congressional Study Group and Task Force | 1 |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | The adolescent, other citizens, and their high schools: A report to the public and the profession | 1 |
About Task Force
Task Force is a scholar working on Health, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Automotive Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (1 paper) and Research Data Management Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (249 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (208 citations) and Gastroenterology (32 citations). Task Force has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Todd H. Baron, Bo Shen, Robert D. Fanelli, Kevin E. Wasco, Steven D. Wexner, David E. Beck, Neil Hyman, G. W. Chang, Alan Hayes and Tamara M. Paravicini. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IEEE Power Engineering Review and AJP Advances in Physiology Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.