Tanya Smith

20 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

Tanya Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 34
  • Public Administration 101
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 138
  • General Health Professions 152
  • Global and Planetary Change 138
Replace Andrew Geddes with:
Andrew Geddes United Kingdom
Avinoam Meir Israel
Marisol Estrella Switzerland
Karyn Bosomworth Australia
Lilia Yumagulova Canada
Andrew P. Kythreotis United Kingdom
Paul O’Hare United Kingdom
Johann Dupuis Switzerland
Robin Bronen United States
Daniel F. Lorenz Germany
Tanya Smith relative to Andrew Geddes United Kingdom Andrew Geddes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Andrew Geddes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tanya Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya Smith. The network helps show where Tanya Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tanya Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tanya Smith Line = papers co-authored together Tanya Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010261
2 201072
3 200953
4 201731
5 201725
6 201124
7 201119
8 201919
9 201814
10 201612
11 20187
12 20207
13 20205
14 20215
15 20244
16 20164
17 20194
18 20223
19 20202
20
Voter Engagement Model: Engaging social work students in civic engagement through social work education
20201

About Tanya Smith

Tanya Smith is a scholar working on Public Administration, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 24 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (12 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (2 papers) and Mining and Resource Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (34 citations), Public Administration (101 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (138 citations), General Health Professions (152 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (138 citations). Tanya Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Lea Berrang‐Ford, James D. Ford, Frank Duerden, Tristan Pearce, Barry Smit, E. Carina H. Keskitalo, Shannon R. Lane, Jason Prno, Tristan Pearce and Mark Andrachuk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Work Education, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Social Work Education, Bird Conservation International and Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact