Tanja Henking

405 citations
41 papers · 172 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Tanja Henking

36 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers

Tanja Henking
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Clinical Psychology 63
  • Applied Psychology 8
  • General Health Professions 35
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 34
Replace Jocelyn Pérez with:
Jocelyn Pérez United States
Jay Carruthers United States
Stephen Jeffreys United Kingdom
Beth Kotzé Australia
Lisa Dixon United States
Karen Furlong Canada
Sarah Dulaney United States
Prisha Shah United Kingdom
Henrik Wåhlberg Norway
Rajani Parthasarathy India
Tanja Henking relative to Jocelyn Pérez United States Jocelyn Pérez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Jocelyn Pérez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tanja Henking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanja Henking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanja Henking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanja Henking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanja Henking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanja Henking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanja Henking. The network helps show where Tanja Henking may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tanja Henking, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tanja Henking Line = papers co-authored together Tanja Henking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201820
2 202217
3 202013
4 202211
5 202011
6 201811
7 20198
8 20217
9 20236
10 20176
11 20166
12 20225
13 20244
14 20214
15 20244
16 20223
17 20223
18 20153
19 20143
20 20243

About Tanja Henking

Tanja Henking is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (13 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (7 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (7 citations), Clinical Psychology (63 citations), Applied Psychology (8 citations), General Health Professions (35 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (34 citations). Tanja Henking has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Vollmann, Silke Neuderth, Jakov Gather, Georg Juckel, Matthé Scholten, Regina Müller, Christine Preiser, Birgitt van Oorschot, Robert Ranisch and Hans‐Jörg Ehni. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Social Work Education, Frontiers in Public Health, Journal of Clinical Nursing and BMC Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact