Tamás Kovács
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 10%
- Microbiology top 5%
- Pollution top 10%
- Co-authors
- György SchneiderGábor RákhelyKrisztián LacziKatalin PereiÁgnes Erdeiné KisNaila BounedjoumGyörgy VinczeÁrpád Szilágyi
- Topics
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (15 papers)Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Virology
In The Last Decade
Tamás Kovács
42 papers receiving 871 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Ecology 389
- Molecular Biology 290
- Plant Science 203
- Microbiology 106
- Pollution 102
Countries citing papers authored by Tamás Kovács
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamás Kovács's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamás Kovács with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamás Kovács more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamás Kovács
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamás Kovács. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamás Kovács. The network helps show where Tamás Kovács may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamás Kovács
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamás Kovács. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamás Kovács based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamás Kovács. Tamás Kovács is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | Exit, Voice, Loyalty and Neglect – political attitudes of Hungarian university and college students | 3 |
| 15 | Bacteriophage therapy against plant, animal and human pathogens | 18 |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | THE PENETRATION OF LOCAL CURRENCIES, A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THE FINANCIAL CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION | 1 |
| 20 | Localisation and seasonal positions of wireworms in soils. | 5 |
About Tamás Kovács
Tamás Kovács is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Ecology and Microbiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (15 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (106 citations), Molecular Medicine (84 citations) and Endocrinology (78 citations). Tamás Kovács has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Italy and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include György Schneider, Gábor Rákhely, Krisztián Laczi, Katalin Perei, Ágnes Erdeiné Kis, Naila Bounedjoum, György Vincze, Árpád Szilágyi, Attila Bodor and Gábor Rákhely. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Virology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.