Tamara van Vreeswijk
About
In The Last Decade
Tamara van Vreeswijk
7 papers receiving 353 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Genetics 283
- Epidemiology 222
- Oncology 141
- Infectious Diseases 99
- Immunology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Tamara van Vreeswijk
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamara van Vreeswijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamara van Vreeswijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamara van Vreeswijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamara van Vreeswijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamara van Vreeswijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamara van Vreeswijk. The network helps show where Tamara van Vreeswijk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamara van Vreeswijk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamara van Vreeswijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamara van Vreeswijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamara van Vreeswijk. Tamara van Vreeswijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 112 | |
| 7 | 67 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.