Tamara Backhouse

726 citations
42 papers · 436 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tamara Backhouse

37 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

Tamara Backhouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 170
  • General Health Professions 254
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Clinical Psychology 101
Replace Rita D’Aoust with:
Rita D’Aoust United States
Anna Pendergrass Germany
Alessandro Ferrari Jacinto Brazil
Kirsten Schultz Petersen Denmark
Yan‐Chiou Ku Taiwan
Alissa Bernstein Sideman United States
Jean Kozak Canada
Helen Donovan United Kingdom
L. Jansen Canada
Alison Marriott United Kingdom
Tamara Backhouse relative to Rita D’Aoust United States Rita D’Aoust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Rita D’Aoust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tamara Backhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamara Backhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamara Backhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamara Backhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamara Backhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamara Backhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamara Backhouse. The network helps show where Tamara Backhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tamara Backhouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tamara Backhouse Line = papers co-authored together Tamara Backhouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201673
2 201973
3 202038
4 201832
5 202126
6 201624
7 201323
8 202016
9 201714
10 202211
11 202111
12 202010
13 20228
14 20226
15 20236
16 19636
17 20235
18 19865
19 19685
20 20225

About Tamara Backhouse

Tamara Backhouse is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and Surgery, having authored 42 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (19 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (170 citations), General Health Professions (254 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations) and Clinical Psychology (101 citations). Tamara Backhouse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eneida Mioshi, Anne Killett, Naoko Kishita, Bridget Penhale, Richard Gray, Fiona Poland, Kathleen Lane, Annmarie Ruston, Diane Burns and Mizanur Khondoker. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Radiology, Ageing and Society, Age and Ageing, Alzheimer s & Dementia and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact