Tamar Frankel
- Accounting top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Finance top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Topics
- Securities Regulation and Market Practices (5 papers)Legal principles and applications (5 papers)Corporate Governance and Law (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Tamar Frankel
43 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Accounting 71
- Economics and Econometrics 57
- Finance 50
- Sociology and Political Science 42
- Strategy and Management 37
Countries citing papers authored by Tamar Frankel
This map shows the geographic impact of Tamar Frankel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamar Frankel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamar Frankel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tamar Frankel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamar Frankel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamar Frankel. The network helps show where Tamar Frankel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tamar Frankel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tamar Frankel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tamar Frankel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tamar Frankel. Tamar Frankel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fiduciary Law in the Twenty-First Century | 5 |
| 2 | Let the Securities and Exchange Commission Outsource Enforcement by Litigation: A Proposal | 3 |
| 3 | The New Financial Assets: Separating Ownership from Control | 1 |
| 4 | Corporate Boards of Directors: Advisors or Supervisors | 1 |
| 5 | How Did We Get Into This Mess | 2 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Government regulation and investors’ trust in the securities markets | 1 |
| 8 | The Managing Lawmaker in Cyberspace: A Power Model | 0 |
| 9 | Regulation and Investors' Trust in the Securities Markets | 3 |
| 10 | Trusting and Non-Trusting on the Internet Symposium: Trust Relationships | 1 |
| 11 | Trust Relationships: Introduction | 2 |
| 12 | Of Theory and Practice | 2 |
| 13 | The Delaware Business Trust Act Failure as the New Corporate Law | 2 |
| 14 | Securitizing Insurance Risks | 4 |
| 15 | Cross-Border Securitization: Without Law, But Not Lawless | 6 |
| 16 | Investment Management Regulation | 2 |
| 17 | The Legal Infrastructure of Markets: The Role of Contract and Property Law Essay | 3 |
| 18 | The Inapplicability of Market Theory to Adoptions | 5 |
| 19 | The Power Struggle Between Shareholders and Directors: The Demand Requirement in Derivative Suits | 1 |
| 20 | The Governor's Private Eyes | 1 |
About Tamar Frankel
Tamar Frankel is a scholar working on Law, Accounting and Finance, having authored 49 papers that have together received 201 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Securities Regulation and Market Practices (5 papers), Legal principles and applications (5 papers) and Corporate Governance and Law (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (71 citations), Finance (50 citations) and Strategy and Management (37 citations). Tamar Frankel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Clark, Lawrence A. Cunningham, Harvey J. Goldschmid and Richard Μ. Buxbaum. Their work appears in journals such as Harvard Law Review, California Law Review and Virginia Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.