Tai Friesem
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 26
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 12
- Surgery top 10%
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 9
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 8
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 3
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 2
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 1
-
- Medical Imaging and Analysis 12
- Co-authors
- Manoj KrishnaHallett H. MathewsS. AunobleChandra BhatiaThomas A. ZdeblickJean-Charles LeHuecJean‐Charles Le HuecLaurence A.G. Marshman
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tai Friesem
30 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 506
- Pharmacology 264
- Surgery 424
- Biomedical Engineering 123
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 14
Countries citing papers authored by Tai Friesem
This map shows the geographic impact of Tai Friesem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tai Friesem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tai Friesem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tai Friesem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tai Friesem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tai Friesem. The network helps show where Tai Friesem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tai Friesem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 6 | PRESERVATION OF CERVICAL RANGE OF MOTION USING A NEW PEEK ON PEEK ARTICULATION CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT: ONE YEAR CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES | 2012 | 1 |
| 7 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 86 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 63 | |
| 16 | Influence of facet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up. | 2005 | 54 |
| 17 | MAVERICK TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT. PROSPECTIVE PRELIMINARY REPORT OF 51 CASES AT MAXIMUM 2 YEARS FOLLOW-UP | 2005 | 1 |
| 18 | 2004 | 46 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 38 | |
| 20 | OUTCOME OF ENDOSCOPIC FUSION WITH THE BAK CAGE | 2003 | 1 |
About Tai Friesem
Tai Friesem is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 31 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (26 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (9 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (8 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (506 citations), Pharmacology (264 citations) and Surgery (424 citations). Tai Friesem has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Manoj Krishna, Hallett H. Mathews, S. Aunoble, Chandra Bhatia, Thomas A. Zdeblick, Jean-Charles LeHuec, Jean‐Charles Le Huec, Laurence A.G. Marshman, J. C. Le Huec and Vijay K. Goel. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, European Spine Journal and The Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.