Khai S. Lam
- Surgery top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert C. MulhollandDominic CarlinJohn K. WebbBrian J. C. FreemanJonathan LucasRoger HärtlLaurent AudigéJeffrey Wang
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Khai S. Lam
35 papers receiving 995 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Surgery 669
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 561
- Pharmacology 369
- Biomedical Engineering 185
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 133
Countries citing papers authored by Khai S. Lam
This map shows the geographic impact of Khai S. Lam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Khai S. Lam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Khai S. Lam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Khai S. Lam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Khai S. Lam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Khai S. Lam. The network helps show where Khai S. Lam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Khai S. Lam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Khai S. Lam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Khai S. Lam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Khai S. Lam. Khai S. Lam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | OUTCOME OF ENDOSCOPIC FUSION WITH THE BAK CAGE | 1 |
| 13 | HIGH INTENSITY ZONE: ENOUGH TO OFFER LUMBAR FUSION? THE ROLE OF LUMBAR DISCOGRAPHY | 1 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 131 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Khai S. Lam
Khai S. Lam is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (23 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (14 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (561 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (133 citations) and Pharmacology (369 citations). Khai S. Lam has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Mulholland, Dominic Carlin, John K. Webb, Brian J. C. Freeman, Jonathan Lucas, Roger Härtl, Laurent Audigé, Jeffrey Wang, Andreas Korge and Frank Kandziora. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery and European Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.