T. Procter

972 citations
3 papers · 11 indexed · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
    • Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
    • Neutrino Physics Research

Papers in

Journals
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (1 paper)City Research Online (City University London) (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

T. Procter

3 papers receiving 11 citations

Peers

T. Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 7
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 9
  • Software 1
  • Hardware and Architecture 1
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1
  • Artificial Intelligence 3
Replace P. Fackeldey with:
P. Fackeldey Germany
M. Ivanov Vietnam
K. Damanakis Austria
Anna Zaborowska Switzerland
L. Benato Germany
R. Itay United States
F. Drielsma United States
Marco Chiusi France
E. Vernazza France
S. Mondal United States
T. Procter relative to P. Fackeldey Germany P. Fackeldey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P. Fackeldey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Procter. The network helps show where T. Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside T. Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Procter Line = papers co-authored together T. Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown

About T. Procter

T. Procter is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Control and Systems Engineering, Hardware and Architecture, Artificial Intelligence and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 3 papers that have together received 11 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Real-time simulation and control systems (1 paper), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (1 paper), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (1 paper), Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference (1 paper), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (1 paper), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (1 paper) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (9 citations), Software (1 citation), Hardware and Architecture (1 citation), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1 citation) and Artificial Intelligence (3 citations). T. Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Leif Lönnblad, A. G. Buckley, J. M. Butterworth, C. Gütschow, Christian Bierlich, Y. Yeh, G. Ünel, J. Kieseler, Are Raklev and Humberto Reyes-González. Their work appears in journals such as ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) and City Research Online (City University London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact