T. O. Lewis

635 total citations
34 papers, 459 citations indexed

About

T. O. Lewis is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, T. O. Lewis has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 459 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Statistics and Probability, 8 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in T. O. Lewis's work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (8 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (7 papers) and Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (6 papers). T. O. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Matrix Theory and Algorithms (8 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (7 papers) and Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (6 papers). T. O. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. T. O. Lewis's co-authors include Patrick L. Odell, T. L. Boullion, H. L. Gray, James H. Smith, George Zyskind, W.J. Kolarik, A. J. Kinderman, W. A. Coberly, Mark Stamp and Linda J. S. Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Technometrics and Biometrika.

In The Last Decade

T. O. Lewis

33 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

T. O. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Statistics and Probability 245
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 107
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 87
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 78
  • Artificial Intelligence 69
Replace R. Lugannani with:
R. Lugannani United States
R. C. H. Cheng United Kingdom
A. Di Bucchianico Netherlands
Dragan Jukić Croatia
D. B. Hunter United Kingdom
Corwin L. Atwood United States
Daniel P. Giesy United States
Nikolay Kyurkchiev Bulgaria
Yoseph Shpungin Israel
M. V. Menon United States
R. Lugannani United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to T. O. Lewis
T. O. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year, relative to T. O. Lewis
T. O. Lewis · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by T. O. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. O. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. O. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. O. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. O. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. O. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. O. Lewis. The network helps show where T. O. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. O. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. O. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. O. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. O. Lewis. T. O. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 9
2 1
3 8
4 25
5 25
6 11
7 9
8 4
9 17
10
Quadratic Matrix Equations
12
11 8
12 51
13 4
14 4
15 6
16 5
17 22
18
A theory of linear estimation
7
19 28
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026