T. Fulton
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Mechanics of Materials top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Co-authors
- F. RohrlichG. FeldmanPaul C. MartinLouis WittenWayne W. RepkoMalcolm FairbairnW. H. KlinkA. Devoto
- Topics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics (31 papers)Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (21 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (18 papers)
- Cited by
- Nuclear and High Energy PhysicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsStatistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
T. Fulton
75 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 834
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 721
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 246
- Mechanics of Materials 236
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 212
Countries citing papers authored by T. Fulton
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Fulton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Fulton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Fulton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. Fulton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Fulton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Fulton. The network helps show where T. Fulton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Fulton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Fulton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Fulton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T. Fulton. T. Fulton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About T. Fulton
T. Fulton is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (31 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (21 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (721 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (834 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (212 citations). T. Fulton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F. Rohrlich, G. Feldman, Paul C. Martin, Louis Witten, Wayne W. Repko, Malcolm Fairbairn, W. H. Klink, A. Devoto, David A. Owen and J. Wess. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Modern Physics and Physics Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.