T. de Neef

435 citations
17 papers · 335 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

T. de Neef

17 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

T. de Neef
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Condensed Matter Physics 185
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 103
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 109
  • Mathematical Physics 27
  • Statistics and Probability 19
Replace A. O. Caride with:
A. O. Caride Brazil
W. John Germany
Kurt Broderix Germany
M. J. Velgakis Greece
J M Loveluck United Kingdom
K Niizeki Japan
S. Naya Japan
M. Robert United States
L. Wojtczak Poland
A. B. MacIsaac Canada
T. de Neef relative to A. O. Caride Brazil A. O. Caride's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
A. O. Caride · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. de Neef

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. de Neef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. de Neef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. de Neef more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. de Neef

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. de Neef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. de Neef. The network helps show where T. de Neef may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside T. de Neef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. de Neef Line = papers co-authored together T. de Neef links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 197774
2 197659
3 197029
4 197528
5 198022
6 197521
7 197219
8 197517
9 197411
10 197411
11 19749
12 19788
13
Treatment of boundaries in unsteady inviscid flow computations
19788
14 19767
15 19746
16 19765
17 19701

About T. de Neef

T. de Neef is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (4 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (2 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers) and Perovskite Materials and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (185 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (103 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (109 citations), Mathematical Physics (27 citations) and Statistics and Probability (19 citations). T. de Neef has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include I. G. Enting, W. J. M. de Jonge, D. C. Koningsberger, K. Kopinga, Gino Moretti, H. Nishihara, J. Hijmans, B. C. Gerstein and D.C. Koningsberger. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Fluids, Chemical Physics Letters, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Physics Letters A and Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact