Sven‐Erik Enno
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Harold E. BrooksRoger EdwardsPieter GroenemeijerJohn T. AllenAntti MäkeläMateusz TaszarekAgrita BriedeTõnu Oja
- Topics
- Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena (11 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers)Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of ClimateGeophysical Research LettersJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomEstoniaNorway
In The Last Decade
Sven‐Erik Enno
13 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Global and Planetary Change 227
- Atmospheric Science 166
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 128
- Environmental Engineering 27
- Ecology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Sven‐Erik Enno
This map shows the geographic impact of Sven‐Erik Enno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sven‐Erik Enno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sven‐Erik Enno more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sven‐Erik Enno
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sven‐Erik Enno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sven‐Erik Enno. The network helps show where Sven‐Erik Enno may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sven‐Erik Enno
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sven‐Erik Enno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sven‐Erik Enno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sven‐Erik Enno. Sven‐Erik Enno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 84 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Variable phase propagation velocity for long-range lightning location system: Variable Velocity for Lightning Location | 7 |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 31 |
About Sven‐Erik Enno
Sven‐Erik Enno is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena (11 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (227 citations), Atmospheric Science (166 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (128 citations). Sven‐Erik Enno has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Estonia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Harold E. Brooks, Roger Edwards, Pieter Groenemeijer, John T. Allen, Antti Mäkelä, Mateusz Taszarek, Agrita Briede, Tõnu Oja, Graeme Anderson and Martin Füllekrug. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Climate, Geophysical Research Letters and Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.