Sven E. Hug

1.0k total citations
23 papers, 588 citations indexed

About

Sven E. Hug is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Sven E. Hug has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 588 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Sven E. Hug's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). Sven E. Hug is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (12 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). Sven E. Hug collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and France. Sven E. Hug's co-authors include Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Michael Ochsner, Lutz Bornmann, Martin P. Brändle, Rüdiger Mutz and Tobias Wolbring and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientometrics and Journal of Informetrics.

In The Last Decade

Sven E. Hug

23 papers receiving 554 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Sven E. Hug 387 115 74 51 43 23 588
Renger E. de Bruin 430 1.1× 143 1.2× 49 0.7× 48 0.9× 36 0.8× 12 715
Ali Gazni 393 1.0× 117 1.0× 63 0.9× 65 1.3× 38 0.9× 21 705
Ben F. Johnson 221 0.6× 74 0.6× 58 0.8× 43 0.8× 35 0.8× 11 431
Clara Calero‐Medina 258 0.7× 82 0.7× 44 0.6× 37 0.7× 18 0.4× 9 496
A. J. Nederhof 451 1.2× 139 1.2× 36 0.5× 50 1.0× 26 0.6× 26 681
Richard D Jones 234 0.6× 101 0.9× 67 0.9× 40 0.8× 35 0.8× 6 444
Ed J. Rinia 308 0.8× 104 0.9× 122 1.6× 34 0.7× 19 0.4× 8 502
Francisco José Muñoz-Fernández 202 0.5× 123 1.1× 50 0.7× 53 1.0× 24 0.6× 9 555
Alberto Baccini 268 0.7× 54 0.5× 46 0.6× 72 1.4× 22 0.5× 48 587
Nadine Desrochers 263 0.7× 60 0.5× 100 1.4× 61 1.2× 50 1.2× 19 450

Countries citing papers authored by Sven E. Hug

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sven E. Hug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sven E. Hug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sven E. Hug more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sven E. Hug

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sven E. Hug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sven E. Hug. The network helps show where Sven E. Hug may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sven E. Hug

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sven E. Hug. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sven E. Hug based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sven E. Hug. Sven E. Hug is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hug, Sven E.. (2024). How do referees integrate evaluation criteria into their overall judgment? Evidence from grant peer review. Scientometrics. 129(3). 1231–1253. 4 indexed citations
2.
Hug, Sven E.. (2022). Towards theorizing peer review. Quantitative Science Studies. 3(3). 815–831. 15 indexed citations
3.
Hug, Sven E. & Michael Ochsner. (2021). Do peers share the same criteria for assessing grant applications?. Research Evaluation. 31(1). 104–117. 10 indexed citations
4.
Hug, Sven E., et al.. (2020). Criteria for assessing grant applications: a systematic review. Palgrave Communications. 6(1). 21 indexed citations
5.
Bornmann, Lutz & Sven E. Hug. (2020). Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied? - Research note. El Profesional de la Informacion. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hug, Sven E., et al.. (2019). Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints). 2 indexed citations
7.
Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2017). Assessment Criteria for Early Career Researcher's Proposals in the Humanities. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 16. 105–111. 1 indexed citations
8.
Ochsner, Michael, et al.. (2017). The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures. Palgrave Communications. 3(1). 23 indexed citations
9.
Hug, Sven E. & Martin P. Brändle. (2017). Microsoft Academic is on the verge of becoming a bibliometric superpower. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 3 indexed citations
10.
Hug, Sven E. & Martin P. Brändle. (2017). The coverage of Microsoft Academic: analyzing the publication output of a university. Scientometrics. 113(3). 1551–1571. 64 indexed citations
11.
Hug, Sven E., Michael Ochsner, & Martin P. Brändle. (2017). Citation analysis with microsoft academic. Scientometrics. 111(1). 371–378. 61 indexed citations
12.
Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2016). Research Assessment in the Humanities. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 43 indexed citations
13.
Ochsner, Michael & Sven E. Hug. (2016). Indicators for Research Performance in the Humanities? The Scholars’ View on Research Quality and Indicators. Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich). 1 indexed citations
14.
Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2014). Setting the stage for the assessment of research quality in the humanities. Consolidating the results of four empirical studies. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. 17(S6). 111–132. 11 indexed citations
15.
Ochsner, Michael, et al.. (2013). AHRABi: Arts and Humanities Research Assessment Bibliography. Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich). 4 indexed citations
16.
Hug, Sven E., Michael Ochsner, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2013). Criteria for assessing research quality in the humanities: a Delphi study among scholars of English literature, German literature and art history. Research Evaluation. 22(5). 369–383. 46 indexed citations
17.
Hug, Sven E., Michael Ochsner, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2012). A Framework to Explore and Develop Criteria for Assessing Research Quality in the Humanities. 17 indexed citations
18.
Ochsner, Michael, Sven E. Hug, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2012). Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities. Research Evaluation. 33 indexed citations
19.
Hug, Sven E., et al.. (2012). Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in the Cecum of a Horse. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2012. 1–5. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hug, Sven E., Michael Ochsner, & Hans‐Dieter Daniel. (2010). Entwicklung von Qualitätskriterien für die Forschung in den Geisteswissenschaften - Eine Explorationsstudie in den Literaturwissenschaften und der Kunstgeschichte. 4(4). 91–105. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renger E. de Bruin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ali Gazni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ben F. Johnson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Clara Calero‐Medina Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. J. Nederhof Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard D Jones Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ed J. Rinia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Francisco José Muñoz-Fernández Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alberto Baccini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nadine Desrochers
Rankless by CCL
2026