Suzanne Jolley

3.0k citations
75 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Suzanne Jolley

72 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Suzanne Jolley
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.7k
  • Philosophy 895
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 714
  • Clinical Psychology 876
  • Social Psychology 364
Replace William D. Spaulding with:
William D. Spaulding United States
Giuseppe Nicolò Italy
I. Janssen Netherlands
Craig Steel United Kingdom
Łukasz Gawęda Poland
Mike Jackson United Kingdom
Michele Procacci Italy
Carolyn John United Kingdom
Jérôme Favrod Switzerland
Raffaele Popolo Italy
Suzanne Jolley relative to William D. Spaulding United States William D. Spaulding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
William D. Spaulding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Suzanne Jolley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Suzanne Jolley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Suzanne Jolley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suzanne Jolley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Suzanne Jolley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Suzanne Jolley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Suzanne Jolley. The network helps show where Suzanne Jolley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Suzanne Jolley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Suzanne Jolley Line = papers co-authored together Suzanne Jolley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 202110
3 201711
4 20152
5 201567
6 201513
7 201515
8 201460
9 201491
10 201426
11 20144
12 201465
13 201225
14 201243
15 201230
16 201281
17
The application of CBT for psychosis in clinical and research settings
20071
18 200654
19 200664
20 200518

About Suzanne Jolley

Suzanne Jolley is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (65 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (34 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (9 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.7k citations), Philosophy (895 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (714 citations), Clinical Psychology (876 citations) and Social Psychology (364 citations). Suzanne Jolley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philippa Garety, Daniel Freeman, Elizabeth Kuipers, Graham Dunn, Paul Bebbington, David Fowler, Helen Waller, Juliana Onwumere, Richard Emsley and Robert Dudley. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy and Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026