Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Advances in the Heck chemistry of aryl bromides and chlorides
Countries citing papers authored by Susan E. Gibson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan E. Gibson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan E. Gibson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan E. Gibson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan E. Gibson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan E. Gibson. The network helps show where Susan E. Gibson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan E. Gibson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan E. Gibson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan E. Gibson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Susan E. Gibson. Susan E. Gibson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gibson, Susan E., et al.. (2012). Professional Learning in a Digital Age. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 38(2).18 indexed citations
Gibson, Susan E., et al.. (2009). Connecting Preservice Teachers With Children Using Blogs. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 17(3). 299–314.1 indexed citations
Gibson, Susan E., et al.. (2006). What Makes an Effective Virtual Learning Experience for Promoting Faculty Use of Technology. International journal of e-learning & distance education. 21(1). 62–74.14 indexed citations
Gibson, Susan E., et al.. (2004). Teacher Professional Development to Promote Constructivist Uses of the Internet: A Study of One Graduate-Level Course. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 12(4). 577–592.5 indexed citations
Gibson, Susan E.. (2002). Incorporating Computer-Based Learning Into Preservice Education Courses. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 2(1). 97–118.10 indexed citations
12.
Gibson, Susan E.. (2002). Using Web-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning in Teacher Education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2002(1). 2179–2182.1 indexed citations
Gibson, Susan E. & Dianne Oberg. (1998). Learning To Use the Internet: A Study of Teacher Learning through Collaborative Research Partnerships.. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. 44(2). 239–241.3 indexed citations
18.
Gibson, Susan E., et al.. (1998). Addressing Instructional Technology Needs in Faculties of Education.. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. 44(3). 320–331.9 indexed citations
19.
Gibson, Susan E., et al.. (1997). Project E.L.I.T.E.: A Case Study Report of Teachers' Perspectives on a Social Studies Computer Pilot Project. 31(4).2 indexed citations
20.
Gibson, Susan E.. (1981). Flow Equations - Revisited.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.