Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Understanding students' perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning
2015258 citationsSuraya Hamid, Jenny Waycott et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Suraya Hamid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Suraya Hamid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suraya Hamid more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Suraya Hamid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Suraya Hamid. The network helps show where Suraya Hamid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Suraya Hamid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Suraya Hamid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Suraya Hamid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Suraya Hamid. Suraya Hamid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hamid, Suraya, et al.. (2018). Modelling the Information-Seeking Behaviour of International Students in Their Use of Social Media in Malaysia.. The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya). 23(4).3 indexed citations
12.
Nasaruddin, Fariza Hanum, et al.. (2017). Post-adoption of Open Government Data Initiatives in Public Sectors. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 274.5 indexed citations
13.
Shah, Asad Ali, Sri Devi Ravana, Suraya Hamid, & Maizatul Akmar Ismail. (2015). Web credibility assessment: affecting factors and assessment techniques. Information Research. 20.19 indexed citations
14.
Hamid, Suraya, Shanton Chang, Jenny Waycott, & Sherah Kurnia. (2012). A Systematic Appropriation of Social Technologies for Educational Activities: Empirical Study of Australian Lecturers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1.1 indexed citations
Hamid, Suraya, et al.. (2011). MAKING SENSE OF THE USE OF ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL DATA USING ACTIVITY THEORY. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
17.
Hamid, Suraya, Jenny Waycott, Sherah Kurnia, & Shanton Chang. (2010). The Use of Online Social Networking for Higher Education from An Activity Theory Perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 135.24 indexed citations
Hamid, Suraya, et al.. (2008). USING E-BALANCED SCORECARD IN MANAGING THE PERFORMANCE AND EXCELLENCE OF ACADEMICIANS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 256.2 indexed citations
20.
Ijab, Mohamad Taha, et al.. (2004). Teaching & Learning of E- Commerce Courses Via Hybrid E-Learning Model In UNITAR (Extended Refereed Paper). Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations. 2(2).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.