Sumohan Chatterjee

414 total citations
9 papers, 192 citations indexed

About

Sumohan Chatterjee is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sumohan Chatterjee has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 192 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Sumohan Chatterjee's work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). Sumohan Chatterjee is often cited by papers focused on Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (2 papers). Sumohan Chatterjee collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Egypt. Sumohan Chatterjee's co-authors include Michael J. Kerin, Philip Drew, John Read, John Fox, John R.T. Monson, P.J. Carleton, Lindsay W. Turnbull, Ashu Gandhi, Cliona Kirwan and Maria Bramley and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Annals of Surgical Oncology and Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

In The Last Decade

Sumohan Chatterjee

8 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sumohan Chatterjee United Kingdom 5 105 98 83 47 16 9 192
Mohammed Absar United Kingdom 6 50 0.5× 12 0.1× 48 0.6× 68 1.4× 12 0.8× 11 128
Margrethe Schlooz-Vries Netherlands 8 83 0.8× 100 1.0× 80 1.0× 56 1.2× 10 197
Agostinho Pinto Gouvêa Brazil 5 49 0.5× 30 0.3× 49 0.6× 51 1.1× 2 0.1× 9 109
Stephanie Akbari United States 6 64 0.6× 41 0.4× 134 1.6× 71 1.5× 12 185
C. Bouteille France 5 42 0.4× 55 0.6× 86 1.0× 22 0.5× 12 135
Yazeed Sawalha United States 8 99 0.9× 19 0.2× 9 0.1× 97 2.1× 18 1.1× 43 169
Farheen Mir United Kingdom 6 109 1.0× 18 0.2× 9 0.1× 74 1.6× 23 1.4× 13 167
Maria Bramley United Kingdom 5 34 0.3× 15 0.2× 55 0.7× 153 3.3× 13 294
Harry Miao United States 9 64 0.6× 14 0.1× 7 0.1× 104 2.2× 23 1.4× 33 149
Harim Koo South Korea 7 10 0.1× 34 0.3× 36 0.4× 17 0.4× 5 0.3× 14 124

Countries citing papers authored by Sumohan Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sumohan Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sumohan Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sumohan Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sumohan Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sumohan Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sumohan Chatterjee. The network helps show where Sumohan Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sumohan Chatterjee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sumohan Chatterjee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sumohan Chatterjee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sumohan Chatterjee. Sumohan Chatterjee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Dave, Rajiv, Vicky P. Taxiarchi, Elizabeth Camacho, et al.. (2021). No association between breast pain and breast cancer: a prospective cohort study of 10 830 symptomatic women presenting to a breast cancer diagnostic clinic. British Journal of General Practice. 72(717). e234–e243. 7 indexed citations
2.
McCartan, Damian & Sumohan Chatterjee. (2021). Hereditary and familial cancer. Surgery (Oxford). 39(4). 228–233.
3.
McCartan, Damian & Sumohan Chatterjee. (2018). Hereditary and familial cancer. Surgery (Oxford). 36(3). 145–150. 4 indexed citations
4.
Eyre, Rachel, Denis Alférez, Katherine Spence, et al.. (2016). Patient-derived Mammosphere and Xenograft Tumour Initiation Correlates with Progression to Metastasis. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 21(3-4). 99–109. 38 indexed citations
5.
Chatterjee, Sumohan, et al.. (2015). P172. Impact of Oncotype DX on the decision for adjuvant chemotherapy: Retrospective analysis of the Salford Royal Foundation Trust cohort. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 41(6). S74–S74. 1 indexed citations
6.
Drew, Philip, Sumohan Chatterjee, Lindsay W. Turnbull, et al.. (1999). Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Is Superior to Triple Assessment for the Pre-Operative Detection of Multifocal Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 6(6). 599–603. 93 indexed citations
7.
Drew, Philip, Lindsay W. Turnbull, Sumohan Chatterjee, et al.. (1999). Prospective Comparison of Standard Triple Assessment and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast for the Evaluation of Symptomatic Breast Lesions. Annals of Surgery. 230(5). 680–680. 28 indexed citations
8.
Chatterjee, Sumohan, et al.. (1995). Glycerol versus radiofrequency rhizotomy - a comparison of their efficacy in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 9(2). 165–170. 18 indexed citations
9.
Stark, R. D., et al.. (1982). An exercise test to assess clinical dyspnoea: Estimation of reproducibility and sensitivity. British Journal of Diseases of the Chest. 76(3). 269–278. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026