Sukrit Suresh
About
In The Last Decade
Sukrit Suresh
3 papers receiving 46 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Surgery 29
- Neurology 26
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 13
- Epidemiology 10
- Emergency Medicine 7
Countries citing papers authored by Sukrit Suresh
This map shows the geographic impact of Sukrit Suresh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sukrit Suresh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sukrit Suresh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sukrit Suresh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sukrit Suresh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sukrit Suresh. The network helps show where Sukrit Suresh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sukrit Suresh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sukrit Suresh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sukrit Suresh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sukrit Suresh. Sukrit Suresh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Results of the Smead-Jones technique of closure of vertical midline incisions for emergency laparotomies--a prospective study of 403 patients. | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.