Stuart Onions

14 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Stuart Onions
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Inorganic Chemistry 133
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 174
  • Organic Chemistry 110
  • Oncology 83
  • Materials Chemistry 116
Replace G�rald Bernardinelli with:
G�rald Bernardinelli Switzerland
Srikanth Dasari India
E. Uller Germany
Jean-Marc Bénech Switzerland
Elif Güngör Türkiye
Yoon Jung Jang South Korea
Karlijn van der Schilden Netherlands
P.M. Guha India
Young-Inn Kim South Korea
G.I. Pascu United Kingdom
Stuart Onions relative to G�rald Bernardinelli Switzerland G�rald Bernardinelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
G�rald Bernardinelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Onions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Onions's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Onions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Onions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Onions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Onions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Onions. The network helps show where Stuart Onions may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Onions, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart Onions Line = papers co-authored together Stuart Onions links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200355
2 200244
3 200339
4 200439
5 200329
6 201520
7 200717
8 201717
9 201617
10 200416
11 200312
12 20186
13 20023
14 20042

About Stuart Onions

Stuart Onions is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Oncology and Spectroscopy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (8 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (6 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (6 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (4 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (2 papers), Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design (1 paper), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (1 paper) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (133 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (174 citations), Organic Chemistry (110 citations), Oncology (83 citations) and Materials Chemistry (116 citations). Stuart Onions has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Craig J. Matthews, D.J. Price, S.L. Heath, Peter N. Horton, Michael B. Hursthouse, Melanie Pilkington, John D. Wallis, H. Stoeckli‐Evans, Craig R. Rice and M.R.J. Elsegood. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact