Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets
2005818 citationsStuart Chape, James Harrison et al.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Chape's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Chape with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Chape more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Chape. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Chape. The network helps show where Stuart Chape may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Chape
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Chape.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Chape based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Chape. Stuart Chape is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lockwood, Michael, Graeme L. Worboys, Mark Spalding, et al.. (2008). Protected areas in the wider context. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
3.
Chape, Stuart, James Harrison, Mark Spalding, & Igor Lysenko. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 360(1454). 443–455.818 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Chape, Stuart & K. Mulongoy. (2004). Protected Areas and Biodiversity: an overview of key issues. UNEP-WCMC Biodiversity Series 21. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).26 indexed citations
5.
Mulongoy, K. & Stuart Chape. (2004). Protected areas and biodiversity : an overview of key issues.72 indexed citations
6.
Chape, Stuart, et al.. (2004). Review of the World Heritage network : biogeography, habitats and biodiversity : final draft. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 2004.7 indexed citations
7.
Chape, Stuart, et al.. (2003). 2003 United Nations list of protected areas. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 2003.258 indexed citations
8.
Chape, Stuart. (1996). Biodiversity conservation, protected areas and the development imperative in Lao PDR : forging the links.8 indexed citations
9.
Watling, Dick & Stuart Chape. (1992). Environment : Fiji : the national state of the environment report.14 indexed citations
10.
Chape, Stuart & Dick Watling. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development : Republic of Fiji national report.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.