Stuart Chalk

645 total citations
32 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Stuart Chalk is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Chalk has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Information Systems, 9 papers in Information Systems and Management and 5 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stuart Chalk's work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (9 papers), Research Data Management Practices (7 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (5 papers). Stuart Chalk is often cited by papers focused on Scientific Computing and Data Management (9 papers), Research Data Management Practices (7 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (5 papers). Stuart Chalk collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Stuart Chalk's co-authors include H. M. Kingston, Julian F. Tyson, Gretchen K. Bielmyer, Kelly J. Smith, Jill Bullington, Naomi Kouri, Leah McEwen, Egon Willighagen, Jeremy G. Frey and Bing Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Chalk

29 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stuart Chalk United States	11	107	101	58	52	41	32	370
Mohamed Hasan Malaysia	12	125 1.2×	128 1.3×	211 3.6×	21 0.4×	42 1.0×	29	547
Andrea-Nicole Richarz United Kingdom	17	85 0.8×	310 3.1×	66 1.1×	84 1.6×	71 1.7×	28	822
Iiris Kahn Estonia	7	47 0.4×	74 0.7×	110 1.9×	173 3.3×	28 0.7×	12	675
Nikolay Kochev Bulgaria	11	24 0.2×	28 0.3×	41 0.7×	189 3.6×	23 0.6×	27	526
Qing Tan China	13	139 1.3×	106 1.0×	81 1.4×	40 0.8×	33 0.8×	33	508
Roy E. Bruns Brazil	14	65 0.6×	44 0.4×	51 0.9×	35 0.7×	34 0.8×	37	457
Douglas W. Bristol United States	12	48 0.4×	90 0.9×	93 1.6×	22 0.4×	27 0.7×	24	453
Xinxin Zhang China	13	57 0.5×	168 1.7×	29 0.5×	30 0.6×	112 2.7×	36	442
T.K. Rao United States	16	68 0.6×	421 4.2×	107 1.8×	31 0.6×	149 3.6×	58	1.1k
C.K. Bayne United States	10	80 0.7×	84 0.8×	55 0.9×	18 0.3×	10 0.2×	21	434

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Chalk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Chalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Chalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Chalk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Chalk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Chalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Chalk. The network helps show where Stuart Chalk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Chalk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Chalk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Chalk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Chalk. Stuart Chalk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Chalk, Stuart, et al.. (2025). Blockchain technology: driving change in the scientific research workflow. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 97(4). 279–330. 2 indexed citations

Chalk, Stuart, et al.. (2024). Blockchain Technology and its Use Along the Scientific Research Workflow. Chemistry International. 46(3). 12–17.

Shaw, David G., Ian Bruno, Stuart Chalk, et al.. (2023). Chemical data evaluation: general considerations and approaches for IUPAC projects and the chemistry community (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. 95(10). 1107–1120.

Hanson, Robert M., Damien Jeannerat, Ian Bruno, et al.. (2022). IUPAC specification for the FAIR management of spectroscopic data in chemistry (IUPAC FAIRSpec) – guiding principles. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 94(6). 623–636. 5 indexed citations

Herres‐Pawlis, Sonja, Felix Bach, Ian Bruno, et al.. (2022). Mindestinformationsstandards in der Chemie: Ein Appell zum besseren Umgang mit Forschungsdaten. Angewandte Chemie. 134(51). 1 indexed citations

Herres‐Pawlis, Sonja, Felix Bach, Ian Bruno, et al.. (2022). Minimum Information Standards in Chemistry: A Call for Better Research Data Management Practices. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 61(51). e202203038–e202203038. 20 indexed citations

Hanisch, R. J., Stuart Chalk, Romain Coulon, et al.. (2022). Stop squandering data: make units of measurement machine-readable. Nature. 605(7909). 222–224. 12 indexed citations

Hanson, Robert M., Damien Jeannerat, Ian Bruno, et al.. (2021). FAIR enough?. 25–25. 3 indexed citations

Chalk, Stuart. (2019). The IUPAC Gold Book website. University of North Florida Digital Commons (University of North Florida). 2 indexed citations

10.

Coles, Simon J., Jeremy G. Frey, Egon Willighagen, & Stuart Chalk. (2019). Taking FAIR on the ChIN: The Chemistry Implementation Network. Data Intelligence. 2(1-2). 131–138. 12 indexed citations

11.

Chalk, Stuart. (2016). SciData: a data model and ontology for semantic representation of scientific data. Journal of Cheminformatics. 8(1). 54–54. 7 indexed citations

12.

Chalk, Stuart. (2016). The Open Spectral Database: an open platform for sharing and searching spectral data. Journal of Cheminformatics. 8(1). 55–55. 7 indexed citations

13.

Wang, Bing, et al.. (2016). Computational Chemistry Data Management Platform Based on the Semantic Web. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 121(1). 298–307. 13 indexed citations

14.

Chalk, Stuart, et al.. (2012). Zinc Distribution in the Organs of Adult Fundulus heteroclitus After Waterborne Zinc Exposure in Freshwater and Saltwater. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 63(4). 544–553. 10 indexed citations

15.

Bielmyer, Gretchen K., et al.. (2012). The Effects of Salinity on Acute Toxicity of Zinc to Two Euryhaline Species of Fish, Fundulus heteroclitus and Kryptolebias marmoratus. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 52(6). 753–760. 40 indexed citations

16.

Kouri, Naomi, et al.. (2007). Spectrophotometric determination of aqueous cyanide using a revised phenolphthalin method. Analytica Chimica Acta. 589(1). 137–141. 41 indexed citations

17.

Chalk, Stuart. (1998). The flow analysis database on the World Wide Web. Talanta. 45(3). 591–599. 3 indexed citations

18.

Jiang, Wenchun, Stuart Chalk, & H. M. Kingston. (1997). Ozone Degradation of Residual Carbon in Biological Samples Using Microwave Irradiation. The Analyst. 122(3). 211–216. 7 indexed citations

19.

Chalk, Stuart & Julian F. Tyson. (1994). Flow injection reagent introduction by supported liquid and nafion membranes: Determination of phosphate. Talanta. 41(10). 1797–1805. 9 indexed citations

20.

Chalk, Stuart, et al.. (1993). Communication. Permeation tubes for calibration in flow injection analysis. The Analyst. 118(9). 1227–1227. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact