Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders
1990845 citationsStuart C. GilsonJournal of Financial Economicsprofile →
Troubled debt restructurings
1990774 citationsStuart C. Gilson, Kose John et al.Journal of Financial Economicsprofile →
Management turnover and financial distress
1989741 citationsStuart C. GilsonJournal of Financial Economicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart C. Gilson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart C. Gilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart C. Gilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart C. Gilson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart C. Gilson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart C. Gilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart C. Gilson. The network helps show where Stuart C. Gilson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart C. Gilson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart C. Gilson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart C. Gilson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart C. Gilson. Stuart C. Gilson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gilson, Stuart C., et al.. (2019). Constellation Brands' Investment in Canopy Growth: Aiming High.
Gilson, Stuart C.. (1998). Course Overview: Creating Value Through Corporate Restructuring. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
10.
Gilson, Stuart C., Paul M. Healy, Christopher F. Noe, & Krishna G. Palepu. (1998). Corporate Focus and the Benefits from More Specialized Analyst Coverage.10 indexed citations
11.
Gilson, Stuart C. & Jerold B. Warner. (1997). Junk Bonds, Bank Debt, and Financial Flexibility. SSRN Electronic Journal.10 indexed citations
DeAngelo, Harry, Linda DeAngelo, & Stuart C. Gilson. (1994). The Collapse of First Executive Corporation: Junk Bonds, Adverse Publicity, and the 'Run on the Bank' Phenomenon. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
15.
Gilson, Stuart C. & Michael R. Vetsuypens. (1994). Creditor Control in Financially Distressed Firms: The Empirical Evidence. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 72(3). 1005–1025.13 indexed citations
Gilson, Stuart C.. (1990). Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders. Journal of Financial Economics. 27(2). 355–387.845 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Gilson, Stuart C., Kose John, & Larry H.P. Lang. (1990). Troubled debt restructurings. Journal of Financial Economics. 27(2). 315–353.774 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Gilson, Stuart C.. (1988). Management-borne costs of financial distress. UMI eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.