Stewart Richmond
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 1%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hugh MacPhersonDavid TorgersonVeronica MortonStephanie L. PradyJennifer A. Klaber MoffettDavid A. JacksonSimon CoultonAda Keding
- Topics
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers)Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (11 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Internal MedicinePLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Stewart Richmond
25 papers receiving 852 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Complementary and alternative medicine 289
- Pharmacology 270
- Cognitive Neuroscience 136
- Economics and Econometrics 131
- General Health Professions 123
Countries citing papers authored by Stewart Richmond
This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart Richmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stewart Richmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart Richmond. The network helps show where Stewart Richmond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stewart Richmond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stewart Richmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stewart Richmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stewart Richmond. Stewart Richmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 106 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | Cost-effectiveness of Shared Pharmaceutical Care for Older Patients | 1 |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 63 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 117 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 116 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Stewart Richmond
Stewart Richmond is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Family Practice, having authored 27 papers that have together received 886 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (11 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (289 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (101 citations) and Family Practice (40 citations). Stewart Richmond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Hugh MacPherson, David Torgerson, Veronica Morton, Stephanie L. Prady, Jennifer A. Klaber Moffett, David A. Jackson, Simon Coulton, Ada Keding, Amanda Farrin and Ann Hopton. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Internal Medicine and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.