Steven M. Day
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- David StraussRobert M. ShavelleRobert J. ReynoldsYvonne W. WuLewis RosenbloomJordan BrooksMichael J. DeVivoJohn Whyte
- Topics
- Spaceflight effects on biology (9 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (9 papers)Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Steven M. Day
40 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Psychiatry and Mental health 660
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 423
- Clinical Psychology 264
- Epidemiology 212
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 207
Countries citing papers authored by Steven M. Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven M. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven M. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven M. Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven M. Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven M. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven M. Day. The network helps show where Steven M. Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven M. Day
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven M. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven M. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven M. Day. Steven M. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 147 | |
| 14 | 99 | |
| 15 | 119 | |
| 16 | Large Scale Dynamic Rupture Modeling with Realistic Geometry | 3 |
| 17 | 80 | |
| 18 | 138 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Steven M. Day
Steven M. Day is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Demography and Health Information Management, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spaceflight effects on biology (9 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (9 papers) and Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (660 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (423 citations) and Emergency Medicine (168 citations). Steven M. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include David Strauss, Robert M. Shavelle, Robert J. Reynolds, Yvonne W. Wu, Lewis Rosenbloom, Jordan Brooks, Michael J. DeVivo, John Whyte, Stephen Ashwal and David Paculdo. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, PEDIATRICS and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.