Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Kearnes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Kearnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Kearnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Kearnes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Kearnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Kearnes. The network helps show where Steven Kearnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Kearnes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Kearnes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Kearnes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Kearnes. Steven Kearnes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kearnes, Steven, Michael Maser, Michael Wleklinski, et al.. (2021). The Open Reaction Database. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 143(45). 18820–18826.179 indexed citations
5.
Sun, Ruoxi, Hanjun Dai, Li Li, Steven Kearnes, & Bo Dai. (2021). Towards understanding retrosynthesis by energy-based models. Neural Information Processing Systems. 34.13 indexed citations
Faber, Felix A., Bing Huang, Justin Gilmer, et al.. (2017). Fast machine learning models of electronic and energetic properties consistently reach approximation errors better than DFT accuracy. arXiv (Cornell University).5 indexed citations
10.
Faber, Felix A., Luke A. D. Hutchison, Bing Huang, et al.. (2017). Prediction Errors of Molecular Machine Learning Models Lower than Hybrid DFT Error. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 13(11). 5255–5264.459 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Kearnes, Steven, Kevin McCloskey, Marc Berndl, Vijay S. Pande, & Patrick Riley. (2016). Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 30(8). 595–608.995 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
McGibbon, Robert T., Carlos X. Hernández, Matthew P. Harrigan, et al.. (2016). osprey: Osprey 1.0.0. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
McGibbon, Robert T., Matthew P. Harrigan, Bharath Ramsundar, et al.. (2016). msmbuilder: MSMBuilder 3.5. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
15.
McGibbon, Robert T., Matthew P. Harrigan, Bharath Ramsundar, et al.. (2016). msmbuilder: MSMBuilder 3.4. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
16.
Kearnes, Steven, Imran S. Haque, & Vijay S. Pande. (2013). SCISSORS: Practical Considerations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 54(1). 5–15.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.