Steven G. Ross

780 total citations
27 papers, 570 citations indexed

About

Steven G. Ross is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven G. Ross has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 570 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 10 papers in Radiation and 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Steven G. Ross's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (13 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers). Steven G. Ross is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (13 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers). Steven G. Ross collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Steven G. Ross's co-authors include C.W. Stearns, Ravindra M. Manjeshwar, Paul E. Kinahan, Sangtae Ahn, Adam Alessio, S.G. Kohlmyer, Tong Shan, Evren Asma, Maria Iatrou and Scott D. Wollenweber and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Physics in Medicine and Biology and IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

In The Last Decade

Steven G. Ross

27 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Steven G. Ross
L. Persoon Netherlands
Irene Polycarpou United Kingdom
Ivan Zhovannik Netherlands
Marina Romanchikova United Kingdom
Entesar Z. Dalah United Arab Emirates
Steven G. Ross
Citations per year, relative to Steven G. Ross Steven G. Ross (= 1×) peers Masahiro Kazama

Countries citing papers authored by Steven G. Ross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven G. Ross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven G. Ross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven G. Ross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven G. Ross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven G. Ross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven G. Ross. The network helps show where Steven G. Ross may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven G. Ross

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven G. Ross. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven G. Ross based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven G. Ross. Steven G. Ross is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gleason, Patrick, Shobhit Sharma, Kurt S. Schultz, et al.. (2024). Dose-efficient characterization of coronary artery plaques with a prototype CdZnTe-based photon-counting CT scanner. 121–121. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kinahan, Paul E., Scott D. Wollenweber, Adam Alessio, et al.. (2016). Task-Oriented Quantitative Performance Assessments for Comparing PET/CT Systems. 57. 255–255. 1 indexed citations
3.
Levin, Craig S., William T. Peterson, Steven G. Ross, C.W. Stearns, & J. Uribe. (2016). PET performance as a function of axial field of view for a new silicon photomultiplier-based whole body TOF PET/CT system. 57. 200–200. 8 indexed citations
4.
Ahn, Sangtae, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of lesion detectability in positron emission tomography when using a convergent penalized likelihood image reconstruction method. Journal of Medical Imaging. 4(1). 11002–11002. 28 indexed citations
5.
Ahn, Sangtae, Steven G. Ross, Evren Asma, et al.. (2015). Quantitative comparison of OSEM and penalized likelihood image reconstruction using relative difference penalties for clinical PET. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 60(15). 5733–5751. 96 indexed citations
6.
Xiao, Jinsheng, Jun Miao, Steven G. Ross, & C.W. Stearns. (2015). Model asymmetrical detector response function with a skew normal distribution function in PET. 1–3. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ahn, Sangtae, et al.. (2015). Improving lesion detectability in PET imaging with a penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9416. 94160W–94160W. 12 indexed citations
8.
Kappadath, S. Cheenu, David Branch, Steven G. Ross, et al.. (2014). Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of regularized PET image reconstruction. 55. 579–579. 6 indexed citations
9.
Ahn, Sangtae, Evren Asma, Steven G. Ross, & Ravindra M. Manjeshwar. (2013). Partial volume correction for penalized-likelihood image reconstruction in oncological PET applications. 1–4. 2 indexed citations
10.
Ross, Steven G., et al.. (2013). Marine and Coastal Sensitivity Mapping for Oil Spill Preparedness and Response. 1 indexed citations
11.
Asma, Evren, Sangtae Ahn, Steven G. Ross, Anthony Chen, & Ravindra M. Manjeshwar. (2012). Accurate and consistent lesion quantitation with clinically acceptable penalized likelihood images. 4062–4066. 37 indexed citations
12.
Ahn, Sangtae, Evren Asma, Kris Thielemans, et al.. (2011). Trade-off between contrast recovery, image noise and edge artifacts in PET image reconstruction using detector blurring models. 4110–4114. 4 indexed citations
13.
Alessio, Adam, C.W. Stearns, Tong Shan, et al.. (2010). Application and Evaluation of a Measured Spatially Variant System Model for PET Image Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 29(3). 938–949. 177 indexed citations
14.
Alessio, Adam, L.R. MacDonald, Scott D. Wollenweber, et al.. (2008). Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 55(3). 975–983. 2 indexed citations
15.
Manjeshwar, Ravindra M., Steven G. Ross, Maria Iatrou, Timothy W. Deller, & C.W. Stearns. (2006). Fully 3D PET Iterative Reconstruction Using Distance-Driven Projectors and Native Scanner Geometry. 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 2804–2807. 23 indexed citations
16.
Buneman, Peter, et al.. (2006). The Digital Curation Centre: A Vision for Digital Curation. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 31–41. 39 indexed citations
17.
Ross, Steven G., G.T. Gullberg, & R.H. Huesman. (2002). The effect of heart motion on parameter bias in dynamic cardiac SPECT. 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 3. 1898–1902. 1 indexed citations
18.
Bella, E.V.R. Di, et al.. (2001). Compartmental Modeling of Technetium-99m–Labeled Teboroxime with Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Investigative Radiology. 36(3). 178–185. 23 indexed citations
19.
Ross, Steven G., A. Welch, G.T. Gullberg, & R.H. Huesman. (1997). An investigation into the effect of input function shape and image acquisition interval on estimates of washin for dynamic cardiac SPECT. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 42(11). 2193–2213. 16 indexed citations
20.
Ross, Steven G., Mark T. Lusk, & W. Lord. (1996). Application of a diffusion-to-wave transformation for inverting eddy current nondestructive evaluation data. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 32(2). 535–546. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026