Steven F. Bacon
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- David T. LykkenMatt McGueJames N. ButcherMichael J. CollinsThomas L. PattersonJ. H. AtkinsonIgor GrantMark A. Slater
- Topics
- Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers)Psychological Treatments and Assessments (2 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyDevelopmental PsychologyPsychosomatic Medicine
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Steven F. Bacon
8 papers receiving 524 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 287
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 206
- Social Psychology 157
- Applied Psychology 86
- Sociology and Political Science 78
Countries citing papers authored by Steven F. Bacon
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven F. Bacon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven F. Bacon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven F. Bacon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven F. Bacon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven F. Bacon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven F. Bacon. The network helps show where Steven F. Bacon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven F. Bacon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven F. Bacon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven F. Bacon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven F. Bacon. Steven F. Bacon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | Does the Global Assessment of Functioning Assess Functioning? (Research) | 14 |
| 3 | Does the Global Assessment of Functioning Assess Functioning | 27 |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 68 | |
| 6 | 312 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | Correctional Retraining in the Navy: An Evaluation. | 1 |
About Steven F. Bacon
Steven F. Bacon is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health Information Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers), Psychological Treatments and Assessments (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (206 citations) and Clinical Psychology (287 citations). Steven F. Bacon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David T. Lykken, Matt McGue, James N. Butcher, Michael J. Collins, Thomas L. Patterson, J. H. Atkinson, Igor Grant, Mark A. Slater and Steven R. Garfin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Developmental Psychology and Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.