Steven A. King

3.7k citations
129 papers · 2.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Steven A. King

117 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Steven A. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 255
  • Organic Chemistry 749
  • Inorganic Chemistry 239
  • History 163
  • Pharmacology 223
Replace Ting Bao with:
Ting Bao United States
Robert Walker United States
Ido Leden Sweden
Daniël J. Hoffman United States
Thomas Zimmermann Germany
Michael D. Johnson United States
Sangita Sharma Canada
Stefan Schneider United States
Ramesh Kumar Pakistan
Brian Fitzgerald United States
Steven A. King relative to Ting Bao United States Ting Bao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×81.5×
Ting Bao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven A. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven A. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven A. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven A. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven A. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven A. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven A. King. The network helps show where Steven A. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven A. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven A. King Line = papers co-authored together Steven A. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993326
2 2002185
3 2002174
4 1994147
5 1999121
6 201698
7 199285
8 199066
9 198964
10
Poverty and Welfare in England, 1700–1850: A regional perspective
200061
11 199059
12 199257
13 200255
14 200053
15 200540
16 200435
17 199831
18 199130
19 198629
20 199529

About Steven A. King

Steven A. King is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, History, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 129 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (32 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (21 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (255 citations), Organic Chemistry (749 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (239 citations), History (163 citations) and Pharmacology (223 citations). Steven A. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Barry M. Trost, James J. Strain, Thomas R. Verhoeven, Anthony O. King, Howard E. Morton, Steven J. Wittenberger, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Damon Duquaine, Paresh D. Patel and Bertram Pitt. Their work appears in journals such as Textile History, Journal of the American Chemical Society, International Review of Social History, Clinical Journal of Pain and Social History of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact