Steve Woolfenden
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- MicroRNA in disease regulation
- Genetics top 10%
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Genetics 5
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 4
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 1
-
- PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer 2
- Cancer-related gene regulation 2
- bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research 1
- Co-authors
- Al CharestRoderick T. BronsonHaihao ZhuRonald A. MeyerMargaret E. McLaughlinDavid E. HousmanJoseph D. GrowneyMindy H. Hsieh
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (3 papers)Cancer Research (3 papers)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)Endocrinology (1 paper)genesis (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Steve Woolfenden
12 papers receiving 702 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Cancer Research 178
- Genetics 117
- Oncology 248
- Molecular Biology 491
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
Countries citing papers authored by Steve Woolfenden
This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Woolfenden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Woolfenden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Woolfenden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Woolfenden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Woolfenden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Woolfenden. The network helps show where Steve Woolfenden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Woolfenden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 325 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 85 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 172 |
About Steve Woolfenden
Steve Woolfenden is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Hepatology, Statistics and Probability and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (2 papers), Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (1 paper), Cancer Research and Treatments (1 paper), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (1 paper) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (178 citations), Genetics (117 citations), Oncology (248 citations), Molecular Biology (491 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations). Steve Woolfenden has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Al Charest, Roderick T. Bronson, Haihao Zhu, Ronald A. Meyer, Margaret E. McLaughlin, David E. Housman, Joseph D. Growney, Mindy H. Hsieh, Feng Cong and Shifeng Pan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cancer Research, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Endocrinology and genesis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.