Steve Franzel

922 total citations
11 papers, 443 citations indexed

About

Steve Franzel is a scholar working on Forestry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve Franzel has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 443 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Forestry, 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 4 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Steve Franzel's work include African Botany and Ecology Studies (4 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (2 papers). Steve Franzel is often cited by papers focused on African Botany and Ecology Studies (4 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (2 papers). Steve Franzel collaborates with scholars based in Kenya, Australia and Zimbabwe. Steve Franzel's co-authors include Rob Swinkels, B. Duguma, Ramni Jamnadass, Festus K. Akinnifesi, Dagmar Mithöfer, Ian K. Dawson, Z. Tchoundjeu, R. R. B. Leakey, Elias T. Ayuk and J. Kengue and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Agricultural Systems and Economic Botany.

In The Last Decade

Steve Franzel

11 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Steve Franzel

FORES

PS

EEBS

GPC

GABS

Sebastian Chakeredza Benin

Tesfaye Abebe Ethiopia

Lucien Diby Ivory Coast

Nyong Princely Awazi Cameroon

Zac Tchoundjeu Cameroon

R. Vodouhè Benin

A. Budelman Netherlands

J.J. Kessler Netherlands

Pablo Siles Colombia

Luis Arévalo Peru

Sebastian Chakeredza Benin

Steve Franzel

175 ×0.8

FORES

142 ×1.1

PS

151 ×1.2

EEBS

104 ×1.2

GPC

122 ×1.6

GABS

Citations per year, relative to Steve Franzel Steve Franzel (= 1×) peers Sebastian Chakeredza

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Franzel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Franzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Franzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Franzel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Franzel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Franzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Franzel. The network helps show where Steve Franzel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Franzel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Franzel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Franzel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Franzel. Steve Franzel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

McMullin, Stepha, James Phelan, Ramni Jamnadass, et al.. (2012). Trade in medicinal tree and shrub products in three urban centres in Kenya. Forests Trees and Livelihoods. 21(3). 188–206. 12 indexed citations

2.

Jamnadass, Ramni, Ian K. Dawson, Steve Franzel, et al.. (2011). Improving livelihoods and nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa through the promotion of indigenous and exotic fruit production in smallholders' agroforestry systems: a review. The International Forestry Review. 13(3). 338–354. 110 indexed citations

3.

Reubens, Bert, Jean Poesen, Jan Nyssen, et al.. (2011). Tree species selection for land rehabilitation in Ethiopia: from fragmented knowledge to an integrated multi-criteria decision approach. Agroforestry Systems. 82(3). 303–330. 79 indexed citations

4.

Franzel, Steve, et al.. (2009). Can organic and resource-conserving agriculture improve livelihoods? A meta-analysis and conceptual framework for site-specific evaluation.. 5 indexed citations

5.

Ham, Cori, et al.. (2006). Baseline Marketing Surveys and Supply Chain Studies for Indigenous Fruit Markets in Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Zambia. 9 indexed citations

6.

Ayuk, Elias T., et al.. (1999). Uses, management and economic potential of Irvingia gabonensis in the humid lowlands of Cameroon. Forest Ecology and Management. 113(1). 1–9. 74 indexed citations

7.

Ayuk, Elias T., et al.. (1999). Uses, management, and economic potential ofDacryodes edulis (Burseraceae) in the Humid Lowlands of Cameroon. Economic Botany. 53(3). 292–301. 37 indexed citations

8.

Rao, M. R., Abdoulaye Niang, F. Kwesiga, et al.. (1998). Soil fertility replenishment in Sub-Saharan Africa: new techniques and the spread of their use on farms. 10(2). 3–8. 29 indexed citations

9.

Swinkels, Rob, et al.. (1997). The economics of short rotation improved fallows: evidence from areas of high population density in Western Kenya. Agricultural Systems. 55(1). 99–121. 50 indexed citations

10.

Swinkels, Rob & Steve Franzel. (1997). ADOPTION POTENTIAL OF HEDGEROW INTERCROPPING IN MAIZE-BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS IN THE HIGHLANDS OF WESTERN KENYA 2. ECONOMIC AND FARMERS' EVALUATION. Experimental Agriculture. 33(2). 211–223. 32 indexed citations

11.

Franzel, Steve, et al.. (1995). The agronomic and economic performance of banana, bean and tree intercropping in the highlands of Burundi: an interim assessment. Agroforestry Systems. 31(3). 199–210. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact