Stetson H. Williams

866 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 685 citations indexed

About

Stetson H. Williams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stetson H. Williams has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 685 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Infectious Diseases and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Stetson H. Williams's work include Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers). Stetson H. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (2 papers) and HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (2 papers). Stetson H. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and France. Stetson H. Williams's co-authors include Amy L. Aldrich, Alexander R. Horswill, T Fritz, Tammy Kielian, Mark L. Hanke, Lance R. Thurlow, Kenneth W. Bayles, Hamid Band, Srikumar M. Raja and Robert J. Clubb and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, The Journal of Immunology and Journal of Controlled Release.

In The Last Decade

Stetson H. Williams

7 papers receiving 674 citations

Hit Papers

Staphylococcus aureus Bio... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stetson H. Williams United States 5 398 155 134 133 97 7 685
Casey M. Gries United States 12 358 0.9× 192 1.2× 137 1.0× 89 0.7× 85 0.9× 17 602
Ranjani Prabhakara United States 9 250 0.6× 212 1.4× 137 1.0× 111 0.8× 134 1.4× 9 559
Tyler D. Scherr United States 9 426 1.1× 283 1.8× 246 1.8× 174 1.3× 194 2.0× 11 750
Kelsey J. Yamada United States 8 262 0.7× 137 0.9× 141 1.1× 73 0.5× 77 0.8× 8 486
Mohini Bhattacharya United States 4 266 0.7× 166 1.1× 100 0.7× 89 0.7× 43 0.4× 7 434
Birgit Prior Germany 16 373 0.9× 77 0.5× 167 1.2× 99 0.7× 120 1.2× 20 672
Roger D. Plaut United States 16 300 0.8× 204 1.3× 167 1.2× 151 1.1× 92 0.9× 24 745
Michelle J. Henry‐Stanley United States 19 346 0.9× 320 2.1× 68 0.5× 87 0.7× 124 1.3× 37 909
Pauline P. Ward United States 15 430 1.1× 164 1.1× 197 1.5× 97 0.7× 252 2.6× 17 1.4k
Manli Na Sweden 18 538 1.4× 268 1.7× 236 1.8× 73 0.5× 126 1.3× 23 887

Countries citing papers authored by Stetson H. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stetson H. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stetson H. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stetson H. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stetson H. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stetson H. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stetson H. Williams. The network helps show where Stetson H. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stetson H. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stetson H. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stetson H. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stetson H. Williams. Stetson H. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Desale, Swapnil S., Srikumar M. Raja, Jong Oh Kim, et al.. (2015). Polypeptide-based nanogels co-encapsulating a synergistic combination of doxorubicin with 17-AAG show potent anti-tumor activity in ErbB2-driven breast cancer models. Journal of Controlled Release. 208. 59–66. 32 indexed citations
2.
Alsalleeh, Fahd, et al.. (2015). Interaction of Candida albicans with periodontal ligament fibroblasts limits biofilm formation over elastomer silicone disks. Archives of Oral Biology. 63. 47–52. 4 indexed citations
3.
Alsalleeh, Fahd, et al.. (2014). Human Periodontal Ligament Cells Response to Commercially Available Calcium Hydroxide Pastes. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science. 6–9. 4 indexed citations
4.
Thurlow, Lance R., Mark L. Hanke, T Fritz, et al.. (2011). Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Prevent Macrophage Phagocytosis and Attenuate Inflammation In Vivo. The Journal of Immunology. 186(11). 6585–6596. 539 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Raja, Srikumar M., Robert J. Clubb, Cesar F. Ortega-Cava, et al.. (2011). Anticancer activity of Celastrol in combination with ErbB2-targeted therapeutics for treatment of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancers. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 11(2). 263–276. 65 indexed citations
6.
Duan, Lei, Srikumar M. Raja, Gengsheng Chen, et al.. (2010). Negative Regulation of EGFR-Vav2 Signaling Axis by Cbl Ubiquitin Ligase Controls EGF Receptor-mediated Epithelial Cell Adherens Junction Dynamics and Cell Migration. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(1). 620–633. 35 indexed citations
7.
Krüger, Nina, T. Reuther, Stetson H. Williams, & Martina Kerscher. (2006). Einfluss eines ureahaltigen Lackes auf die Nagelqualität. Der Hautarzt. 57(12). 1089–1094. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026