Stephen T. Lewis
- Plant Science
- Pollution top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Robert J. WatkinsonPhilip G. MorganCorey W. JohnsonMarieke Van PuymbroeckN.S. BattersbyStephen C. GrahamBrent L. HawkinsFrancis A. McGuire
- Topics
- Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (4 papers)Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (3 papers)Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaEnvironmental PollutionSoil Biology and Biochemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Stephen T. Lewis
14 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Plant Science 138
- Pollution 132
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 65
- Social Psychology 47
- Sociology and Political Science 41
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen T. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen T. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen T. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen T. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen T. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen T. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen T. Lewis. The network helps show where Stephen T. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen T. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen T. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen T. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen T. Lewis. Stephen T. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Mathvision: A Mobile Video Application for Math Teacher Noticing of Learning Progressions. | 1 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 89 |
About Stephen T. Lewis
Stephen T. Lewis is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Pharmacy and Pollution, having authored 16 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (4 papers), Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (3 papers) and Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (132 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (65 citations) and Plant Science (138 citations). Stephen T. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Watkinson, Philip G. Morgan, Corey W. Johnson, Marieke Van Puymbroeck, N.S. Battersby, Stephen C. Graham, Brent L. Hawkins, Francis A. McGuire, Ryan J. Gagnon and Michael T. Battista. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Pollution and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.