Stephen Rutherford

1.5k total citations
23 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Stephen Rutherford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Rutherford has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Plant Science and 5 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Stephen Rutherford's work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers). Stephen Rutherford is often cited by papers focused on Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers). Stephen Rutherford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Stephen Rutherford's co-authors include Ian Moore, Rachel M. Leech, Elizabeth J. Robertson, Won‐Young Lee, Kevin D. Stokes, Ann Percival, Katherine W. Osteryoung, Kevin Pyke, Clare Lister and Joanne Marrison and has published in prestigious journals such as The Plant Cell, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and The Plant Journal.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Rutherford

20 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Rutherford United Kingdom 13 826 587 196 64 61 23 1.1k
Elina Welchen Argentina 23 962 1.2× 978 1.7× 32 0.2× 37 0.6× 17 0.3× 47 1.4k
Stephen G. Hughes United Kingdom 18 690 0.8× 355 0.6× 54 0.3× 7 0.1× 85 1.4× 39 1.1k
Josef Maier Germany 13 325 0.4× 197 0.3× 48 0.2× 21 0.3× 40 0.7× 24 557
Yoshihiko Onda Japan 17 313 0.4× 444 0.8× 26 0.1× 6 0.1× 33 0.5× 25 664
C.J. Herbert France 18 1.2k 1.4× 121 0.2× 72 0.4× 38 0.6× 45 0.7× 48 1.4k
Mariano Perales Spain 19 1.6k 1.9× 1.5k 2.6× 38 0.2× 13 0.2× 15 0.2× 31 1.9k
Ben P. Williams United States 14 619 0.7× 449 0.8× 15 0.1× 21 0.3× 25 0.4× 19 897
J. Ignacio Moreno United States 12 364 0.4× 284 0.5× 44 0.2× 11 0.2× 12 0.2× 19 624
Ilga Winicov United States 23 855 1.0× 903 1.5× 52 0.3× 16 0.3× 35 0.6× 50 1.3k
Nancy N. Artus United States 9 464 0.6× 609 1.0× 17 0.1× 6 0.1× 20 0.3× 13 738

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Rutherford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Rutherford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Rutherford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Rutherford. The network helps show where Stephen Rutherford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Rutherford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Rutherford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Rutherford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Rutherford. Stephen Rutherford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rutherford, Stephen, et al.. (2024). A Picture Paints a Thousand Words: Perspectives of the Use of Images and Videos of Physical Findings in Virtual OSCE Teaching Sessions. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. Volume 15. 909–920.
2.
Rutherford, Stephen, Caroline Pritchard, & Nigel Francis. (2024). Assessment IS learning: developing a student‐centred approach for assessment in Higher Education. FEBS Open Bio. 15(1). 21–34. 3 indexed citations
3.
Evans, Carol, et al.. (2024). Developing a scale to explore self-regulatory approaches to assessment and feedback with academics in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1357939–1357939. 1 indexed citations
4.
Francis, Nigel, Caroline Pritchard, Zoë Cariad Prytherch, & Stephen Rutherford. (2024). Making teamwork work: enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher education. FEBS Open Bio. 15(1). 35–47. 4 indexed citations
6.
Ganesananthan, Sashiananthan, et al.. (2022). Assessing the Publicity and Reach of Peer-Led Online Medical Teaching: A Single-Event Evaluation. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. Volume 13. 781–788. 4 indexed citations
7.
Rutherford, Stephen. (2017). Informal Learning: Perspectives, Challenges and Opportunities. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 2 indexed citations
8.
Rutherford, Stephen. (2015). E pluribus unum: the potential of collaborative learning to enhance Microbiology teaching in higher education: Graphical Abstract Figure.. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 362(23). fnv191–fnv191. 16 indexed citations
9.
Rutherford, Stephen, et al.. (2015). Creatine Supplementation in the Elderly: is Resistance Training Really Needed?. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 2(2). 1 indexed citations
10.
Rutherford, Stephen, et al.. (2015). The Design Student's Handbook.
11.
Rutherford, Stephen. (2014). Collaborative learning: theory, strategies and educational benefits. 19 indexed citations
12.
Rutherford, Stephen, et al.. (2013). Creatine Supplementation: Can it Improve Quality of Life in the Elderly without Associated Resistance Training?. Current Aging Science. 6(3). 251–257. 30 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Harriet, Laura Hoppitt, John R. Prendergast, et al.. (2012). Exploring Students’ Initial Reactions to the Feedback They Receive on Coursework. Bioscience Education. 20(1). 3–21. 11 indexed citations
14.
Rainwater, David L., Stephen Rutherford, Thomas D. Dyer, et al.. (2008). Determinants of variation in human serum paraoxonase activity. Heredity. 102(2). 147–154. 66 indexed citations
15.
Rutherford, Stephen, Federica Brandizzí, Helen Townley, et al.. (2005). Improved transcriptional activators and their use in mis‐expression traps in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 43(5). 769–788. 45 indexed citations
16.
Rutherford, Stephen & Ian Moore. (2002). The Arabidopsis Rab GTPase family: another enigma variation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 5(6). 518–528. 286 indexed citations
17.
Marrison, Joanne, Stephen Rutherford, Elizabeth J. Robertson, et al.. (1999). The distinctive roles of five different ARC genes in the chloroplast division process in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 18(6). 651–662. 91 indexed citations
18.
Osteryoung, Katherine W., Kevin D. Stokes, Stephen Rutherford, Ann Percival, & Won‐Young Lee. (1998). Chloroplast Division in Higher Plants Requires Members of Two Functionally Divergent Gene Families with Homology to Bacterial ftsZ. The Plant Cell. 10(12). 1991–1991. 20 indexed citations
19.
Robertson, Elizabeth J., Stephen Rutherford, & Rachel M. Leech. (1996). Characterization of Chloroplast Division Using the Arabidopsis Mutant arc5. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 112(1). 149–159. 77 indexed citations
20.
Pyke, Kevin, Stephen Rutherford, Elizabeth J. Robertson, & Rachel M. Leech. (1994). arc6, A Fertile Arabidopsis Mutant with Only Two Mesophyll Cell Chloroplasts. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 106(3). 1169–1177. 117 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026