Stephen Pratten

591 citations
38 papers · 337 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Pratten

33 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Stephen Pratten
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • History and Philosophy of Science 40
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 70
  • Economics and Econometrics 170
  • Sociology and Political Science 178
  • Urban Studies 24
Replace Bradley W. Bateman with:
Bradley W. Bateman United States
David L. Prychitko United States
Julian Hoppit United Kingdom
Andreas Pickel Canada
Jeremy Shearmur Australia
James R. Wible United States
S. M. Amadae United States
Norman Barry United Kingdom
David M. Woodruff United Kingdom
Mary O. Furner United States
Stephen Pratten relative to Bradley W. Bateman United States Bradley W. Bateman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bradley W. Bateman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pratten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pratten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pratten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pratten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pratten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pratten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pratten. The network helps show where Stephen Pratten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Pratten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Pratten Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Pratten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199828
2 199726
3 199326
4 201722
5 201320
6 201720
7 199616
8 201515
9 199614
10 202014
11 200514
12 200913
13 200012
14 200110
15 20229
16 20088
17 20237
18 20007
19 20037
20 20076

About Stephen Pratten

Stephen Pratten is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Philosophy of Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Philosophy, having authored 38 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (14 papers), Critical Realism in Sociology (13 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (3 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (70 citations), Economics and Econometrics (170 citations), Sociology and Political Science (178 citations) and Urban Studies (24 citations). Stephen Pratten has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Simon Deakin, Jochen Runde, Philip Faulkner, Clive Lawson, Mark Peacock, Cornelia Lawson, Tom Lawson and Paul Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Economics, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Journal of Economic Issues, Contributions to Political Economy and Review of Political Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact