Mark Peacock

540 citations
44 papers · 277 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Peacock

40 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers

Mark Peacock
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 76
  • Economics and Econometrics 119
  • Finance 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 120
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Richard Toye with:
Richard Toye United Kingdom
George Demartino United States
David L. Prychitko United States
Brandon Dupont United States
Gavin Kennedy United Kingdom
Istvan Hont United Kingdom
Bradley W. Bateman United States
David Feldman United Kingdom
Stephen Pratten United Kingdom
Robbins United States
Mark Peacock relative to Richard Toye United Kingdom Richard Toye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Toye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Peacock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Peacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Peacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Peacock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Peacock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Peacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Peacock. The network helps show where Mark Peacock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Peacock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Peacock Line = papers co-authored together Mark Peacock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200330
2 200624
3 201320
4 199616
5
Connecting Science: What we know and what we don’t know about science in society
200515
6 201715
7 200914
8 200613
9 20149
10 20149
11 20009
12 20119
13 20079
14 20108
15 19937
16 20007
17 20056
18 20016
19 20006
20 20126

About Mark Peacock

Mark Peacock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Philosophy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Economic theories and models (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (3 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (76 citations), Economics and Econometrics (119 citations), Finance (29 citations), Sociology and Political Science (120 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Mark Peacock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Schefczyk, Clive Lawson, Stephen Pratten, Helen Haste, Lorraine Whitmarsh, Claire Russell, Peter Schaber and Paul A. Roth. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Economics, History of the Human Sciences, Review of Political Economy, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour and Philosophy of the Social Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact