Stephen Pfohl

6.9k citations
38 papers · 1.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 16

Stephen Pfohl

33 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Gulf War Did Not Take Place.3381997202620062016100200300

Peers

Stephen Pfohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Health Informatics 115
  • Health Information Management 85
  • Communication 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 410
  • Philosophy 95
Replace Andrew Milner with:
Andrew Milner Australia
Karen Jones United Kingdom
Graeme Laurie United Kingdom
Sandra Soo‐Jin Lee United States
Eric T. Juengst United States
John McCarthy United States
John Gardner Australia
Paula Boddington United Kingdom
Silke Schicktanz Germany
James Heywood United States
Stephen Pfohl relative to Andrew Milner Australia Andrew Milner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Andrew Milner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pfohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pfohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pfohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pfohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pfohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pfohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pfohl. The network helps show where Stephen Pfohl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Pfohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Pfohl Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Pfohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20246
3 20246
4 202328
5 202220
6 202245
7 20214
8 202122
9 202066
10 202073
11 201831
12 201813
13 201588
14
Digital Magic, Cybernetic Sorcery: On the Politics of Fascination and Fear
20100
15
The Cybernetic Delirium of Norbert Wiener
19974
16 19938
17 19909
18 198760
19 198796
20 198615

About Stephen Pfohl

Stephen Pfohl is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Health Information Management, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Biological Psychiatry and Statistics and Probability, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Machine Learning in Healthcare (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (115 citations), Health Information Management (85 citations), Communication (69 citations), Sociology and Political Science (410 citations) and Philosophy (95 citations). Stephen Pfohl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Patton, Jean Baudrillard, Nigam H. Shah, Richard Warner, Cassie S. Mitchell, Robert F. Meier, Martin Halicek, Jason Fries, Ethan Steinberg and Lillian Sung. Their work appears in journals such as Social Problems, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Scientific Reports, Journal of Biomedical Informatics and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026