Stephen N. Davis
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 0.05%
- Surgery top 0.5%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Physiology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Philip E. CryerHarry ShamoonDonna B. TateWilliam C. DuckworthDomenic J. RedaRodney A. HaywardPeter D. ReavenMaka S. Hedrington
- Topics
- Diabetes Management and Research (133 papers)Pancreatic function and diabetes (70 papers)Diabetes Treatment and Management (64 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen N. Davis
197 papers receiving 12.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 9.0k
- Surgery 3.8k
- Genetics 2.4k
- Physiology 2.3k
- Molecular Biology 2.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen N. Davis
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen N. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen N. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen N. Davis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen N. Davis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen N. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen N. Davis. The network helps show where Stephen N. Davis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen N. Davis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen N. Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen N. Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen N. Davis. Stephen N. Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Perceptions of culturally competent diabetes management in a primary care practice. | 4 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 105 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Stephen N. Davis
Stephen N. Davis is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 202 papers that have together received 13.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Research (133 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (70 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (64 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (9.0k citations), Physiology (2.3k citations) and Genetics (2.4k citations). Stephen N. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philip E. Cryer, Harry Shamoon, Donna B. Tate, William C. Duckworth, Domenic J. Reda, Rodney A. Hayward, Peter D. Reaven, Maka S. Hedrington, Nicholas Emanuele and Grant D. Huang. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Circulation Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.