Stephen Mumford
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rani Lill AnjumGeorge MolnarKenan DikilitaşElton KesselRoger KerryPaul J. FeldblumRichard A. KronmalCoralyn W. Whitney
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (23 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (22 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Stephen Mumford
112 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 876
- Philosophy 786
- History and Philosophy of Science 729
- Cognitive Neuroscience 272
- General Health Professions 206
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Mumford
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Mumford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Mumford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Mumford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Mumford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Mumford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Mumford. The network helps show where Stephen Mumford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Mumford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Mumford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Mumford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Mumford. Stephen Mumford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 68 | |
| 3 | Freedom and Control. On the modality of free will | 2 |
| 4 | Powers as Causal Truthmakers | 1 |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | The academic word list | 4 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | The Catholic Doctrine and Reproductive Health | 1 |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | A Puzzle about Causation | 1 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Stephen Mumford
Stephen Mumford is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Family Practice, having authored 122 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (23 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (22 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (729 citations), Philosophy (786 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (876 citations). Stephen Mumford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Rani Lill Anjum, George Molnar, Kenan Dikilitaş, Elton Kessel, Roger Kerry, Paul J. Feldblum, Richard A. Kronmal, Coralyn W. Whitney, Matthew Tugby and Edward E. Wallach. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.