Stephen Mock

2.0k citations
41 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Mock

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Stephen Mock
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Information Systems and Management 339
  • Urology 222
  • Computer Networks and Communications 315
  • Rheumatology 171
  • Structural Biology 11
Replace Brian Hutchinson with:
Brian Hutchinson United States
Philipp Neumann Germany
Hu United States
Stéphane Gagnon Canada
Jin Ben China
Hong Yi China
Dingsheng Liu China
P. G. Marchetti Italy
Bruno Richard France
Junjie Zhu China
Stephen Mock relative to Brian Hutchinson United States Brian Hutchinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×84.8×
Brian Hutchinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Mock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Mock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Mock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Mock. The network helps show where Stephen Mock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Mock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Mock Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Mock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004284
2 2017207
3 2010111
4 201445
5 200339
6 201535
7 201434
8 201532
9 201431
10 201631
11 200228
12 201326
13 201617
14 201612
15 200610
16 20169
17 20168
18 20158
19 20058
20 20138

About Stephen Mock

Stephen Mock is a scholar working on Urology, Information Systems and Management, Rheumatology, Computer Networks and Communications and Gastroenterology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (14 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (12 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (11 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (11 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (7 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (4 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (339 citations), Urology (222 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (315 citations), Rheumatology (171 citations) and Structural Biology (11 citations). Stephen Mock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include İlkay Altıntaş, Chad Berkley, Matthew B. Jones, Bertram Ludäscher, Roger R. Dmochowski, William M. Reynolds, Melissa R. Kaufman, David J. Osborn, Douglas F. Milam and Matthew Hanlon. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, Neurourology and Urodynamics, Clinical Cancer Research and Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026