Stephen Mock

2.0k total citations
41 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Stephen Mock is a scholar working on Urology, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Mock has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Urology, 14 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 14 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Stephen Mock's work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (14 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (12 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (11 papers). Stephen Mock is often cited by papers focused on Scientific Computing and Data Management (14 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (12 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (11 papers). Stephen Mock collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Russia. Stephen Mock's co-authors include İlkay Altıntaş, Chad Berkley, Matthew B. Jones, Bertram Ludäscher, Roger R. Dmochowski, William M. Reynolds, Melissa R. Kaufman, David J. Osborn, Douglas F. Milam and Matthew Hanlon and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Proceedings of the IEEE and Clinical Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Mock

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Mock United States 13 339 315 222 171 160 41 1.0k
Philipp Neumann Germany 16 37 0.1× 61 0.2× 4 0.0× 5 0.0× 16 0.1× 59 1.3k
Brian Hutchinson United States 23 4 0.0× 13 0.0× 65 0.3× 140 0.8× 27 0.2× 70 2.3k
Hu United States 11 6 0.0× 203 0.6× 12 0.1× 3 0.0× 79 0.5× 159 705
Hong Yi China 13 88 0.3× 39 0.1× 6 0.0× 52 0.3× 45 1.1k
P. G. Marchetti Italy 12 50 0.1× 27 0.1× 2 0.0× 129 0.8× 184 1.1× 32 922
Stéphane Gagnon Canada 22 19 0.1× 25 0.1× 2 0.0× 10 0.1× 22 0.1× 76 1.5k
Jin Ben China 15 12 0.0× 89 0.3× 2 0.0× 10 0.1× 15 0.1× 53 911
Dingsheng Liu China 15 42 0.1× 107 0.3× 5 0.0× 84 0.5× 47 566
Laura M. Sangalli Italy 20 4 0.0× 5 0.0× 44 0.2× 66 0.4× 12 0.1× 78 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Mock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Mock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Mock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Mock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Mock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Mock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Mock. The network helps show where Stephen Mock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Mock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Mock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Mock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Mock. Stephen Mock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brown, Elizabeth T., David J. Osborn, Stephen Mock, et al.. (2016). Temporal Trends in Conduit Urinary Diversion With Concomitant Cystectomy for Benign Indications: A Population-based Analysis. Urology. 98. 70–74. 8 indexed citations
2.
Leapman, Michael S., Nelson N. Stone, Stephen Mock, Richard G. Stock, & Simon J. Hall. (2016). Urinary Incontinence Following Prostate Brachytherapy. Urology. 95. 151–157. 9 indexed citations
3.
Mock, Stephen, David J. Osborn, Elizabeth T. Brown, et al.. (2016). The Impact of Pallidal and Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Urologic Function in Parkinson’s Disease. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 19(7). 717–723. 31 indexed citations
4.
Brown, Elizabeth T., David J. Osborn, Stephen Mock, et al.. (2016). Perioperative complications of conduit urinary diversion with concomitant cystectomy for benign indications: A population‐based analysis. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 36(5). 1411–1416. 12 indexed citations
6.
Cowell, Lindsay G., John Fonner, Mikhail K. Levin, et al.. (2015). VDJServer: a web-accessible analysis portal for immune repertoire sequence data (HUM1P.317). The Journal of Immunology. 194(1_Supplement). 52.42–52.42. 3 indexed citations
7.
Osborn, David J., Roger R. Dmochowski, Melissa R. Kaufman, et al.. (2014). Analysis of patient and technical factors associated with midurethral sling mesh exposure and perforation. International Journal of Urology. 21(11). 1167–1170. 31 indexed citations
8.
Osborn, David J., et al.. (2014). Urinary retention rates after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injection for idiopathic overactive bladder in clinical practice and predictors of this outcome. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 34(7). 675–678. 45 indexed citations
9.
Osborn, David J., Roger R. Dmochowski, Melissa R. Kaufman, et al.. (2014). Cystectomy With Urinary Diversion for Benign Disease: Indications and Outcomes. Urology. 83(6). 1433–1437. 34 indexed citations
10.
Crivelli, Silvia, et al.. (2014). Creating a gateway that enables large‐scale science coopetition. Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience. 27(2). 446–457. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hanlon, Matthew, Warren Smith, & Stephen Mock. (2014). Providing resource information to users of a national computing center. Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience. 26(13). 2292–2302. 1 indexed citations
12.
Mock, Stephen & Roger R. Dmochowski. (2013). Evaluation of fesoterodine fumarate for the treatment of an overactive bladder. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 9(12). 1659–1666. 6 indexed citations
13.
Kim, Soo, Stephen Mock, & Jeffrey Stock. (2013). Cystine Nephrolithiasis. Urology. 82(2). e7–e8. 8 indexed citations
14.
Mock, Stephen, Michael Leapman, Richard G. Stock, Simon J. Hall, & Nelson N. Stone. (2013). Risk of Urinary Incontinence Following Post-Brachytherapy Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Correlation with Clinical and Treatment Parameters. The Journal of Urology. 190(5). 1805–1810. 26 indexed citations
15.
Hanlon, Matthew, Warren Smith, & Stephen Mock. (2013). Providing resource information to users of a national computing center. 1–8. 6 indexed citations
16.
Baldridge, Kim K., Karan Bhatia, Jerry P. Greenberg, et al.. (2006). GEMSTONE: GRID ENABLED MOLECULAR SCIENCE THROUGH ONLINE NETWORKED ENVIRONMENTS. 155–175. 10 indexed citations
17.
Baldridge, Kim K., Jerry P. Greenberg, Wibke Sudholt, et al.. (2005). The Computational Chemistry Prototyping Environment. Proceedings of the IEEE. 93(3). 510–521. 8 indexed citations
18.
Altıntaş, İlkay, et al.. (2004). Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. 284 indexed citations
19.
Baldridge, Kim K., Jerry P. Greenberg, Stephen T. Elbert, Stephen Mock, & Philip M. Papadopoulos. (2002). QMView and GAMESS: Integration into the World Wide Computational Grid. Conference on High Performance Computing (Supercomputing). 1–25. 2 indexed citations
20.
Mock, Stephen, et al.. (2002). The Perl Commodity Grid Toolkit. Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience. 14(13-15). 1085–1095. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026