Stephen McWilliams

804 citations
30 papers · 583 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen McWilliams

28 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Stephen McWilliams
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 409
  • Philosophy 131
  • Clinical Psychology 209
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Social Psychology 148
Replace Corrine Cather with:
Corrine Cather United States
Karina Hansen Denmark
Tomasz Adamowski Poland
Javier-David López-Moríñigo Spain
Susan N. Legacy United States
Joan M. Anzia United States
Cris Henderson United States
Sabina Abidi Canada
Rafael Gafoor United Kingdom
Suat Küçükgöncü Türkiye
Stephen McWilliams relative to Corrine Cather United States Corrine Cather's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Corrine Cather · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen McWilliams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen McWilliams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen McWilliams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen McWilliams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen McWilliams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen McWilliams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen McWilliams. The network helps show where Stephen McWilliams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen McWilliams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen McWilliams Line = papers co-authored together Stephen McWilliams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201791
2 200989
3 201539
4 202132
5 200931
6 200829
7 201428
8 201225
9 201225
10 200722
11 200820
12 202116
13 201115
14 202015
15 200814
16 200913
17 201012
18 201212
19 201911
20 200711

About Stephen McWilliams

Stephen McWilliams is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (20 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (409 citations), Philosophy (131 citations), Clinical Psychology (209 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations) and Social Psychology (148 citations). Stephen McWilliams has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eadbhard O’Callaghan, Anthony Kinsella, Dolores Keating, Niall Turner, Laoise Renwick, Mary Clarke, Deirdre Jackson, Judith Strawbridge, Caragh Behan and Gráinne Cousins. Their work appears in journals such as Early Intervention in Psychiatry, BMJ Open, European Psychiatry, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact