Stephen McG Barratt
- Surgery
- Gastroenterology top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Ian PowerJohn LeedsDavid S. SandersMichael J. CousinsLaurence E. MatherPremal J. ShahRoss C. SmithAlan Lobo
- Topics
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers)Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers)Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Stephen McG Barratt
15 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Surgery 245
- Gastroenterology 194
- Epidemiology 148
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 85
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen McG Barratt
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen McG Barratt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen McG Barratt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen McG Barratt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen McG Barratt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen McG Barratt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen McG Barratt. The network helps show where Stephen McG Barratt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen McG Barratt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen McG Barratt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen McG Barratt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen McG Barratt. Stephen McG Barratt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Factors influencing the type, timing and severity of symptomatic responses to dietary gluten in patients with biopsy-proven coeliac disease. | 26 |
| 2 | Quality of life in Coeliac Disease is determined by perceived degree of difficulty adhering to a gluten-free diet, not the level of dietary adherence ultimately achieved. | 118 |
| 3 | 63 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 117 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 |
About Stephen McG Barratt
Stephen McG Barratt is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (194 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (85 citations) and Surgery (245 citations). Stephen McG Barratt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Ian Power, John Leeds, David S. Sanders, Michael J. Cousins, Laurence E. Mather, Premal J. Shah, Ross C. Smith, Alan Lobo, Mark McAlindon and Anthony J. Kee. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Nutrition, The Medical Journal of Australia and CNS Drugs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.