Stephen Lincoln

847 citations
25 papers · 599 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Lincoln

25 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Stephen Lincoln
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Reproductive Medicine 198
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 60
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 65
  • Immunology 81
  • Emergency Medicine 32
Replace R. J. Fitzpatrick with:
R. J. Fitzpatrick United Kingdom
Varsha Padwal India
L. Munyakazi United States
Iwan Lewis‐Jones United Kingdom
C. Barthélémy France
Yuki Hirano Japan
Massimo Menegazzo Italy
T. K. Mukherjee Malaysia
Srividya Seshadri United Kingdom
I. A. Swanston United Kingdom
Stephen Lincoln relative to R. J. Fitzpatrick United Kingdom R. J. Fitzpatrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
R. J. Fitzpatrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lincoln

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lincoln's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lincoln with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lincoln more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lincoln

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lincoln. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lincoln. The network helps show where Stephen Lincoln may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lincoln, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Lincoln Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Lincoln links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994109
2 201876
3
Screening for hypothyroidism in infertile women.
199966
4 198453
5 201940
6 199535
7 200228
8 199326
9 199224
10 199722
11 200118
12 199817
13 199611
14 201910
15 19959
16 20208
17 19958
18 19948
19 20187
20 19957

About Stephen Lincoln

Stephen Lincoln is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (198 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (60 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (65 citations), Immunology (81 citations) and Emergency Medicine (32 citations). Stephen Lincoln has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marvin A. Yussman, Ranjan Srivastava, W.H. Kutteh, Ch.V. Rao, Joseph S. Sanfilippo, Jacquelynn Benjamino, Bryan D. Cowan, Joerg Graf, Péter T. Tóth and J. A. Spinnato. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Fungal Genetics and Biology and Microbiome.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact