Stephen L. Seliger
- Nephrology top 0.02%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 0.2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Catherine Stehman‐BreenBryan KestenbaumMichael G. ShlipakDavid S. SiscovickLinda F. FriedChristopher R. deFilippiRobert H. ChristensonAnne B. Newman
- Topics
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (43 papers)Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (38 papers)Heart Failure Treatment and Management (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Stephen L. Seliger
173 papers receiving 12.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Nephrology 6.0k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 4.5k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.1k
- Surgery 1.7k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Seliger
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Seliger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Seliger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Seliger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Seliger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Seliger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Seliger. The network helps show where Stephen L. Seliger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Seliger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Seliger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Seliger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Seliger. Stephen L. Seliger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 135 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 79 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 106 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 167 | |
| 20 | 115 |
About Stephen L. Seliger
Stephen L. Seliger is a scholar working on Nephrology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 177 papers that have together received 12.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (43 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (38 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (6.0k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (4.5k citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (378 citations). Stephen L. Seliger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Stehman‐Breen, Bryan Kestenbaum, Michael G. Shlipak, David S. Siscovick, Linda F. Fried, Christopher R. deFilippi, Robert H. Christenson, Anne B. Newman, Mark J. Sarnak and Ronit Katz. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Circulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.