Stephen J. Walsh
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- David R. SpringJason S. CarrollJonathan D. BarghJeremy S. ParkerAlbert Isidro‐LlobetThomas A. KingNicola AshmanHikaru Seki
- Topics
- Click Chemistry and Applications (11 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Stephen J. Walsh
26 papers receiving 944 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Molecular Biology 478
- Organic Chemistry 436
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 411
- Oncology 408
- Biomedical Engineering 48
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Walsh
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Walsh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Walsh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Walsh. The network helps show where Stephen J. Walsh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Walsh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Walsh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Walsh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Walsh. Stephen J. Walsh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | Site-selective modification strategies in antibody–drug conjugatesbreakdown → | 315 |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Stephen J. Walsh
Stephen J. Walsh is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Organic Chemistry, having authored 29 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Click Chemistry and Applications (11 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (411 citations), Organic Chemistry (436 citations) and Oncology (408 citations). Stephen J. Walsh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include David R. Spring, Jason S. Carroll, Jonathan D. Bargh, Jeremy S. Parker, Albert Isidro‐Llobet, Thomas A. King, Nicola Ashman, Hikaru Seki, Andrew J. Counsell and Elaine Fowler. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Society Reviews, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.